Yeah. The things that I consider to be relevant. And I can tell you what
the more astute observers, who have really been on the scene while it
was all taking place, are going to be writing. I think they're going to
be, first of all, saying that I surrounded myself with some very
capable, dedicated people. You know, the success of any administration
depends on both the intelligence, the dedication, and the integrity of
the people you surround yourself with. Every administration that winds
up getting in trouble, you find that the man who's been doing the
personnel selection has, shall I say, been a poor judge of character.
Or, on the other hand, they have picked people that they thought would
not overshadow them or people that they thought would never constitute a
political threat to them. I've done my best, even with our limited
salaries, to pick the people I thought who could do the job and would do
the job. Now that is sort of subjective analysis of the administration.
To get down to the point, what you're asking me is what part of my
administration do I think future generations will
Page 2
appreciate most. I think, obviously, one is going to be the tax reform
package we put through in 1971 which gives the state an opportunity to
wax and wane with the economy. I've been very fortunate because the
economy's been waxing since I've been governor. I don't take any credit
for that. But it has and therefore the coffers of the state have waxed
with it. We've been able to do so many things that I'm sure predecessors
have wanted to do but simply didn't have the money to do.
And secondly, that ties in with the reorganization that we made and did
in fact accomplish. The reorganization of state government because two
things happened. One, a reorganization in and by itself would have been
a very significant accomplishment simply because from an administrative
standpoint, when I came in, the governor had 165 department heads
reporting to him. He couldn't possibly stay on top of a situation
operating the government with that many people reporting to him. So what
we did, we took 65 of the major departments, the big ones, and
consolidated them into 13 departments. So I now have 13 people reporting
to me. And of course this has given us an opportunity to implement
personnel policies and other broad policies in cabinet meetings and
implement those policies.
Secondly, it has given the governor the opportunity to keep his mandate
with the people because in the past the governor would go out and tell
the people in the state what he believed, what his philosophy was and
the specific things he wanted to accomplish, only to arrive at the
capital and find that these 165 people had their own ideas about what
the state was doing and how it was going to be operated and what we were
going to do. And in many of those instances you had virtually autonomous
boards and commissions for each one of those departments. And these
department heads and those boards and commissions which had this
autonomy, they were making policy decisions and it may or may not,
Page 3 it would be a pure coincidence if it tied in with
what you'd been saying and what you wanted the policy of the state to
be. So when you have thirteen men around a table who are responsible for
about 90% of the functions of the state and you say this is going to be
the policy and you have the right to hire and fire those people, they're
going to be responsive. And that's the way it ought to be. They're part
of the executive branch. They should be responsive to the governor
because the governor is the guy who made the commitment and went out and
got himself elected.
And then finally . . . you can say to these people . . . you have the
fiscal responsibility. Of course now when I talk about policy I'm sort
of separating fiscal policy from say other policy of all kinds. But so
far as fiscal policy is concerned, the governor is the one who has to
sit there and either veto or sign bills on the basis of how much money
we're going to have to spend. And so I sit down and go through all these
thirteen department budgets and I cut where I think the priorities ought
to be. So that there's enough money, for example, for the medical
center. And maybe some other program over here has two or three exotic
programs in it that we can do without because it's not as important, for
example, as health care. And you know when it comes to making the money
fit in the pie, that's the governor's responsibility. And reorganization
has, for the first time, given the governor the opportunity to see that
overview so that he knows before the legislature comes in what those
budgets are, what he will accept, and what he cannot accept.
So those are the things, the reorganization of state government coupled
with the tax reform programs. See, we put a fairly stiff progressive
income tax into effect. And the upper income levels now pay a
significantly bigger share of income tax in this state than they used
to. We took away some privileges the utilities had. Tax exemptions,
which they never had any right to except they just happened
Page 4 to have the political clout back in 1949 to get it. And it
took just about all the power of my office to get those things repealed
because they were out there fighting, scrapping, to keep them. But those
two things, plus I think the significant accomplishments we have begun
to make in the fields of prison reform and health care . . . to me those
are the really outstanding things of this admin—