North Carolina voters oppose machine politics
North Carolina's one-party system dominated politics and served as an informal political machine until Sanford's governorship in 1960. This passage implies that North Carolinians avoided appearances of machine politics, preferring one-party politics instead. However, this grew increasingly impractical in the face of a growing Republican Party.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with Terry Sanford, [date unknown]. Interview A-0140. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- TERRY SANFORD:
-
...There wasn't any Democratic party except in times of those
organizations coming together down to election time. In '60, Mr.
Broughton had died, Mr. Umstead had died, Mr. Scott had died, Governor
Hodges didn't have any organization. And we were operating without the
usual structures that made a political organization in this state, our
one-party system. And so the time was right for somebody to put together
a new coalition of people, and that fell to me because I came along at
that time. And that's what we see today. Not with any intense loyalty to
Sanford, but people that have more or less coalesced around the concept
of the kind of politics we worked at. And I take no particular credit
for that, except that I happened to be here at the time. Nor do I think
all the loyalty runs to me, because it was proved
in the '72 election.
- WALTER DE VRIES:
-
But is there an organization other than just personal contact and
informal contact?
- TERRY SANFORD:
-
The enduring thing about the machine, if that's the word you want to use,
is that we never really set out to have one, that we never based it on
what they could get out of it. And we never based it on the fact that we
had to win all the elections. And we might have solidified that
organization by the Richardson Preyer defeat. A little side note, that
carried over, as you know. All these candidates didn't
necessarily want to be associated with me, or didn't want
to be considered a part of a machine, or a machine hand-picked
candidate. In any event, it was bad politics. Almost everybody knew that
I was for Preyer, but Preyer himself didn't want Bennett and me working
for him or speaking out for him. I think it was a mistake in strategy,
but how could I say so. I might say that I thought Skipper lost some
votes by standing too far away from me, but how again can I say so. And
I couldn't in Preyer's campaign, though we had talked with him about
running after Hodges had, incidentally. But we had encouraged him to
run, Bert Bennett and me. Then it was concluded that it would be better
for us to look out for the national campaign, let Preyer run his own
campaign. He called on me about two days before the second primary, and
asked me if I'd make a public television appearance with him on his
behalf. But that's the first time in that calendar year that he'd called
on me. It's almost the first time that he'd mentioned my name. And his
wife was so delighted. They thought it was so great. And I felt like if
they'd called on me back in February, it might have been able to change
some things. Cause I could've campaigned mostly for him without fear
that if we lost I'd take all the blame from him. But I think I could
have been very effective, and . . . if they let Moore campaign against
me, not against Preyer, and wouldn't let me campaign back against Moore,
that is what they said . . . I figured that Preyer had a right to run
his own campaign. But when they asked me on about Thursday to speak on
Friday night, or maybe it was Wednesday, I knew that it was an absolute
lost cause. The only question in my mind was
whether it was going to get to be two to one or four to one. But I
decided to go speak. I could have just left it alone and I'd have been
about halfway tainted with the defeat. But I decided to go speak,
because all of our friends, all over the state, were going down in local
defeat. Our candidate was being defeated statewide, and I figured it
would be a damn good thing for the long run life of the group if I went
down real publicly, right on out there, taking all the things that they
took. And that's one of the main reasons I just eagerly jumped on it. So
I had no illusions that we could turn the election around. Anybody
could, with one speech.