Difficulty in shifting power base in Texas politics
Farenthold again addresses what she sees as the lack of real change in shifting political power during the post-World War II years. It was because of this lack of change that she focused so much on reform during her two terms in the state legislature and during her 1972 gubernatorial bid. Here, she talks about difficulty in effecting change in political power bases in relationship to different constituencies, notably labor.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with Frances Farenthold, December 14, 1974. Interview A-0186. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- WALTER DE VRIES:
-
But your experiences suggest that things really haven't changed very much
in Texas politics in the last twenty years?
- FRANCES FARENTHOLD:
-
I don't think that they have, except for this overt racism.
- WALTER DE VRIES:
-
Why not? Is the grip that strong?
- FRANCES FARENTHOLD:
-
I think so? That's why . . .
- WALTER DE VRIES:
-
Why can't you shake it?
- FRANCES FARENTHOLD:
-
(laughter)
That's why I had felt so deeply about that reform, because I
knew how hard it was to get anything like that started in Texas. And
that's why I thought that it was so important.
- JACK BASS:
-
Why didn't any of the so called "progressives" in
statewide office now run against Briscoe this year? Was it just fear of
the two term tradition?
- FRANCES FARENTHOLD:
-
See, I couldn't . . . maybe I was the one in error, I couldn't buy the
two term tradition. It's one of the things that was controlling in my
own situation this time, the fact that we were going into four year
terms of office. This is the first year that we have had four year terms
of office. And I have an idea, again I'm not in the center of all this,
I have to observe or go through my own experience . . . I think that I
have seen enough to say that I believe that the lack of opposition this
year, and I know two of them that were both headed that way if they can
get there, Hill and Hobby . . . it's a part of the Bentsen strategy. I
don't want to overstate what I know, but I am inclined to think that.
And part of it was to have no dissension, have a quite convention. I
remember somewhere . . . and I used to say during this primary of mine
this year, "let's not let state government go down the drain
over presidential politics." Well, the
four year term was passed in '70, it was not even discussed. Everyone
just sort of stayed in place. And I remember during the campaign just
seeing the thing that . . . well, several things lead me to saying what
I just said. One is the night before I filed this time, when a labor
lawyer told me . . . and I lost my labor support this time, just like
that. He said, "Your problem with labor is not Briscoe, but
Bentsen." Then I remember during the primary reading where
Bentsen said that his office was working with Briscoe, his office was
working with his 254 county contacts and they in turn were working with
Briscoe on the convention. So, that's the way I feel in part. I remember
going to the state convention in September and the Steelworkers
supported me last time and they did not this time, and one of them said
to me, "We can't support Leonel this time, just as we could not
support you in May and the reason is that we want unity for
'76." Now, you analyze that, I'm not able to.
- WALTER DE VRIES:
-
It looks like you already have. What about the assertion that if you put
together the black vote, the Chicano vote and the liberal vote, you've
got a majority in Texas?
- FRANCES FARENTHOLD:
-
It hasn't happened yet.
- WALTER DE VRIES:
-
Is it there?
- FRANCES FARENTHOLD:
-
Theoretically.