Dabney's lectureships at Cambridge and Princeton
Dabney traces his experiences as a lecturer at Cambridge and Princeton. Both lectureships involved a discussion of race relations and the New South. Dabney admits that Cambridge students were more interested in McCarthyism.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with Virginius Dabney, July 31, 1975. Interview A-0311-2. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- DANIEL JORDAN:
-
You held very important lectureships, one at Cambridge and one at
Princeton. I wondered if we might talk briefly about each. First the one
at Cambridge.
- VIRGINIUS DABNEY:
-
It was what was called the Fulbright Conference on American Studies. It
was a conference held annually at Oxford or Cambridge for several years
with the support of Fulbright funds and Rockefeller funds. It happened
to be at Cambridge the year that I went. They had about eight lecturers
from the United States on various categories of interest, all of which
were supposed to be things that professors in English and Scottish
universities would be especially interested in. We lectured and had
informal discussions for several weeks. I was there for
three weeks. Some remained longer, but I couldn't stay that
long. It was a very stimulating experience. There were, I suppose, maybe
seventy-five professors from all over the United Kingdom who were
interested especially in the United States.
- DANIEL JORDAN:
-
What was the content of your series of lectures?
- VIRGINIUS DABNEY:
-
Well, I was given a free rein to choose any subject that I wanted to, I
was the only newspaper man in the group.
- DANIEL JORDAN:
-
Had there been other newspaper men before you, or were you the first
editor?
- VIRGINIUS DABNEY:
-
I was the first one. I chose three very lively topics, almost too lively.
Namely, Anglo-American relations, the race problem in the United States
and Senator Joseph McCarthy.
- DANIEL JORDAN:
-
This would be 1954 and I am sure that the Supreme Court decision would
already have been given in May.
- VIRGINIUS DABNEY:
-
That's right, it was a few months after the Supreme Court decision.
- DANIEL JORDAN:
-
Do you recall your general thrust of your comments on race relations?
- VIRGINIUS DABNEY:
-
I think that the general thrust was that we could live with this
decision; that it was something that was inevitable; we did not know
exactly how it would work out in this part of the country and were
apprehensive concerning certain parts of Virginia which had made it
clear already that they did not intend to comply, if they could possibly
avoid it.
- DANIEL JORDAN:
-
What about McCarthyism?
- VIRGINIUS DABNEY:
-
It was at its height at that time. It was the most talked about subject
in England apropos the United States. My feeling was that
McCarthy was a disgrace to the country and a disreputable
scoundrel, to put it mildly, who was getting much more attention than he
deserved. The British press was unbelieveably absorbed in the McCarthy
issue. They had him on the front page nearly everyday. I tried to
explain that I had no use for McCarthy and also that I thought he was
being played up entirely too much in the papers.
- DANIEL JORDAN:
-
Would you tell us a little now about your lectureship at Princeton in
1939-1940?
- VIRGINIUS DABNEY:
-
Dr. Thomas J. Wertenbarker, the famous historian at Princeton, was on
sabbatical for the session of 1939-40 and he needed somebody to fill in;
he needed several people to fill in. He asked me to fill in for the
second semester of that year from February to May. I went to Princeton
every week and gave two lectures on successive days, and a seminar each
day, all having to do with the New South.
- DANIEL JORDAN:
-
This was a very difficult physical routine, I would imagine. You
continued to be editor at the same time?
- VIRGINIUS DABNEY:
-
Yes. I was trying to keep from getting fired as editor and also from
getting fired as a lecturer. I had to do a tremendous lot of work in
preparing these lectures, since I hadn't done anything like that before.
I then had to go up there for two days. I went overnight on the sleeper,
and was unable to sleep on the car satisfactorily the whole time. I had
to change trains twice to get there, on top of having to go in the
sleeping coach. Coming back, I left in the mid-afternoon and had to
change trains to get back that night around ten o'clock. I was usually
pretty well exhausted when I arrived.
- DANIEL JORDAN:
-
And Princeton, I believe had a sort of market place system whereby
students, if they didn't like a course could simply withdraw.
- VIRGINIUS DABNEY:
-
That's right, they could sign up for the course and then after they heard
one or two lectures, they could drop out. Fortunately, none of mine
dropped out; in fact, several came on.
- DANIEL JORDAN:
-
Did you have any guest speakers in your lectures?
- VIRGINIUS DABNEY:
-
Yes, since one aspect of the New South was TVA, I had Wendell Willkie,
who was then on the verge of being nominated for president, and who had
then been extremely active in the TVA controversy, in opposition to TVA.
I tried to get David Lilienthal, who was the leading spokesman for TVA,
to appear with Wilkie in order to give a guest lecture in opposition,
but he was unable to arrange it. It went off very well; Willkie was
quite attractive as a lecturer, and he was not unduly biased on the
issue.
- DANIEL JORDAN:
-
This was in the spring before his nomination later in the year?
- VIRGINIUS DABNEY:
-
In April or May of 1940. The lectures went at least until the middle of
May and he was nominated, I think, the next month.