Sanford parallels his later political campaign with Graham's
The Frank Graham and Willis Smith senatorial campaign left Sanford embittered about politics. Unlike Graham's quiet demeanor, Sanford learned to attack negative campaigns aggressively.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with Terry Sanford, May 14, 1976. Interview A-0328-1. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- BRENT GLASS:
-
I was interested in how that campaign, what kind of impact it had on you,
and obviously . . .
- TERRY SANFORD:
-
Well, it left me very bitter because I thought it was a vicious, dirty
campaign. I might say that I never thought that Willis Smith personally
was responsible for it. And that was another lesson that I learned, and
that was to keep charge of your own campaign. I personally thought and
think that Willis Smith's a very decent individual. He got dragged,
sucked into this. He really wasn't all that experienced in politics,
though he'd been Speaker of the House and a Kerr Scott
supporter, as a matter of fact. Not many lawyers were. But
he got one step further and one step further, and the campaign got
dirtier and dirtier, and he just got drawn into it. First thing you
knew, forces that he couldn't stop were running that campaign.
- BRENT GLASS:
-
This was the
- TERRY SANFORD:
-
Oh hell no. He would deny, has denied it today, but one of the principal
architects of that was Jessie Helms. And another principal architect was
a young fellow named Daniels from Angier. I believe he's dead now.
Anyhow, he was one of my Legionaire buddies. But the racism, they saw it
as a winning issue. And they took full advantage of it. Smathers was
beating Pepper at the time on pretty much the same sort of an assault.
More Communism than black in Florida, but the race issue in northern
Florida was just as evil as it was here. The only thing I'm saying is
that I learned a lesson from both sides. One, don't give them any
quarter; and second, don't let somebody else drag you into something you
don't want to do. You'd better keep charge of your own issues. I really
do think that that shortened Willis Smith's life. I could be wrong. But
I think he was embarrassed by having been victimized by winning in that
way.
- BRENT GLASS:
-
Did Graham ever talk about it after . . . did you ever talk with him
about that campaign afterwards? He wasn't really a politician. He must
have been a politician to have done what he did at the University, but .
. .
- TERRY SANFORD:
-
Well, he was too gentle and too considerate of other people. He never
expressed an unkind thought about Willis Smith to me, and I
expressed several at the time that, in retrospect, I'm
certain were not correct. Well, it didn't take me long to feel they were
not correct. But he never showed any bitterness. He probably never
showed any bitterness about anything.
- BRENT GLASS:
-
Could you say that you learned anything from Graham directly as far as
politics were concerned?
- TERRY SANFORD:
-
Well, I learned the most important lesson of all, that it was the
purpose, and the issue, and the reason for being there that were
important, not getting there, which is a very valuable lesson. In fact,
if it were not for that, then I'd say politics would not be for me if
you didn't think that when you got there, you could do something
worthwhile in that you ought to try to get there in a way, an honorable
way. Now I didn't do anything differently much from what Frank Graham
did in the second primary except I did it more forcefully. I did it in a
way that he was too gentle to have done. I didn't mind fighting back
when Lake accused me of getting all the block vote. That was then a code
word, the block vote, meaning that the blacks were voting for you
unanimously; therefore, you weren't to be trusted. And that was about
the way it turned out. Well, they accused him of getting the block vote.
And I was ready for them.
Well, I'll tell you another little story that I doubt has ever been out.
And I maybe ought to, since I don't know what'll come of this, it won't
hurt to leave the county out.
- BRENT GLASS:
-
Whatever you say, you have control over.
- TERRY SANFORD:
-
I understand. But in any event, at that time, it was
possible to control the black vote beyond maybe what they thought they
could do. Johnson was asked, "Do you want the black vote in
Durham?"
- BRENT GLASS:
-
Which Johnson is this now?
- TERRY SANFORD:
-
Jeff Johnson, the campaign manager for Frank Graham. "Do you
want the black vote for Graham, or do you want to split it up so that it
won't hurt in the second primary?" This, at that time, was the
most obvious black block in the state. He meditated for a while, and he
said, "Well, let's shoot the works. Let's try to win in the
first primary." Well, you know, they almost did. They got
something like forty-eight or forty-nine percent. It was very, very
close. They did, indeed, turn the block vote on him. So Lake turned the
block vote on me. He said, "I got all the block vote."
I said, "Nothing of the kind." I had seen to it that
Seawell got the Durham vote. He got it all. And I was reading polls. I
didn't have to guess. I knew I couldn't win in the first primary.
Seawell had a certain appeal to the black votes. He had a certain appeal
to the Watts Hills here because of Hodges. I just saw to it. I not only
didn't lift my finger, but I told this same person that asked Jeff
Johnson, "See that Seawell gets that vote. I don't want
them." But he got about eighty-nine percent of it, or something
like that. I got it all in Raleigh, and I got it all in Wilmington, and
I got it all in Fayetteville, and I got it all everywhere else.
- BRENT GLASS:
-
How about Winston? Does Winston have a machine?
- TERRY SANFORD:
-
Oh yes. I got it all in Winston. There isn't any question I got the black
vote in the first primary because I'd been the only one really speaking
to their problems.
- BRENT GLASS:
-
But not in Durham.
- TERRY SANFORD:
-
I didn't want it. I didn't get it in Asheville either for a peculiar kind
of, not a peculiar reason, but up there the sheriff and the city manager
ran it. I carried that Buncombe County, but I didn't get the black vote.
That's about all they could take away from me. And they really did take
it away from me. They'd bought it, and they had controlled it. I say
bought it in a legal sense of it. You know, if you hire the workers, you
get the vote. And that's the way it was. Then in Statesville, there's a
man named Churchill who's car salesman, a car dealer, a right well-t-do
fellow. I don't know; it seems to me like it was a used-car operation.
But anyhow, I'd known him, and he was very friendly to me. But he's also
a racist. He'd decided to be for Lake. I lost that county. I'm bound to
have lost the black vote because Churchill had the reputation of owning
it. I hope his name was Churchill. I'll do somebody disservice if it
wasn't. In any rate, so when he accused me of having the black vote, I
says, not so. I got what I could, but Seawell got it in Durham, Larkins
got it in Asheville, and Dr. Lake got it in Iredell County. Well, then
it took him ten days to deny that. You know, I kept saying, well, he got
the block vote too. Well, Frank Graham wouldn't have done that. That
wasn't dishonest. It might have been sneaky. I think it was just
aggressive defense of the position. It was, of course, a dishonest issue
from the start to finish to talk about a block vote. In any event, I
learned from Frank Graham not to be that nice on that particular
issue.
- BRENT GLASS:
-
Where there any other kinds of blocks that people could
feel they could deliver, like, let's say, industrial mill
workers, or this kind of thing?
- TERRY SANFORD:
-
Well, the union was a real detriment to the politician in this state. But
I'd always spoken very kindly of unions, not because I thought it was
any political advantage, in fact, I knew it was a political detriment.
The communication workers did a tremendous job with Scott, including
when we wanted a telephone line for some statewide radio broadcast.
Nobody in the top command had to bother about it, but the workers saw to
it that we got the A-grade line. We got the quality because Scott had
been good to them or decent to them, which nobody else had ever been.
Hodges made them a whipping boy. He tried to break unions with the power
of the governor's office. Well, I hadn't and I'd been good to them and
if they looked across the field, they didn't have any friend but me. The
communications workers are all right because they're very quiet about
it. They just go on about putting up posters and probably taking down
opponents' posters since they got all these people out with the
telephone companies.
- BRENT GLASS:
-
How about unorganized
- TERRY SANFORD:
-
Well, nobody can deliver them. Then Millard Barbee was president of
A.F.L.-C.I.O., and he just was absolutely chomping at the bit to endorse
me. And I was trying as best I could to tell him, don't do me any
favors. You know, don't say anything. He finally did endorse me. I'm
satisfied it cost me more votes than it got me. I had no problem with
giving labor, organized labor, its proper place. I felt that the
unionization had been good for the country, let alone for workers.
So, I hadn't had any problems with being friendly
to labor and didn't later on. You know, that's still not a popular
position in this state, the "Right to Work" law. But
anyhow, no. Not only could they not deliver that vote; that vote, in
spite of Millard Barbee's endorsement in the second primary, went to
Lake, as you might guess. He was more likely to get that vote than I
was, in spite of the union discipline or lack of discipline.