Moderation slowly gives way to riots in integrating Alabama
Alabamans took a somewhat accomodationist approach toward the <cite>Brown</cite> ruling, LeMaistre remembers here. But they also moved to integrate very slowly, and before very long that somewhat moderate approach to school integration gave way to riots.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with George A. LeMaistre, April 29, 1985. Interview A-0358. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
Well, anyhow . . .
What is your impression of the first reaction to the Brown decision in
Alabama?
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
In '54. It was in the spring, as I recall. The first reaction was,
"Well, this is another obstacle that we are going to have to
overcome." The general talk was, "Well, that's in
Topeka and really doesn't affect us yet, but we've got to be
prepared." And you had a lot of talk about how we are going to
get around it. I remember one of the senators became quite angry with me
when he asked me what are we going to do about the Brown decision, and I
told him that I thought it was pretty damn near time we started
enforcing it. That wasn't what he wanted to hear; he thought that we
ought to have some way of accommodating ourselves to the decision
without coming up with mixed schools. And there just wasn't any way, the
way that decision was written.
- ALLEN J. GOING:
-
A lot of Southerners thought there were some ways.
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
Oh yes. You remember we even got around to that massive resistance stuff
in Virginia where they would simply have no schools if they had to have
blacks and whites together.
- ALLEN J. GOING:
-
I think Alabama was fortunate, if I can use that term, in having Folsom
in at that time.
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
So we did not have any . . . I don't think we even had a bill
introduced—may have, but it didn't pass, to abolish public
schools. That was one of the solutions that was suggested that nothing
in the constitution said that the State had to educate anybody. And so
they were talking about abolishing public schools, and one or two states
attempted to do that. The Little Rock confrontation between Faubus and
Eisenhower probably had a profound impact in Alabama, and the blowing up
of a school in Clinton, Tennessee, one or two places like that where the
Klan got into it made some decent people realize that we don't belong on
the side of those people. And they tried to figure out ways to
accommodate themselves to the procedure without destroying the
system.
- ALLEN J. GOING:
-
And also the implementing decision in the Brown case, I think, came a
year later, and that seemed to moderate because that's when . . .
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
That's when they came out with "all deliberate speed,"
phrase and I think that the Supreme Court used an unfortunate expression
then. A lot of people thought all deliberate speed meant be deliberate
but make it look speedy. And really some people were sort of lulled into
a feeling of well, it's not as bad as we think it is; we don't have to
comply immediately.
- ALLEN J. GOING:
-
It's certainly an ambiguous phrase.
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
As a result we are still fighting it; we still have cases pending right
here in Tuscaloosa on the method of integrating the schools.
- ALLEN J. GOING:
-
Alabama was brought rather suddenly into the spotlight December 1, 1955,
when Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat in Montgomery, and then it
was just a few months later when Autherine Lucy registered here. That
really brought it out.
- GEORGE A. LeMAISTRE:
-
It also brought out rioting and renewed activity by the Ku Klux Klan and
brought that genteel group known as the White Citizens Council out of
the woodwork. And so it was a pretty tough time round about then. As a
matter of fact a lot of the energy of some of our
"loudspeakers" (so to speak) was turned to the subject
of integration rather than politics. I think that accounts for the fact
that the congressmen and the senators didn't get a whole lot of flack at
that time, but what they thought was the backwash from the integration
arguments . . . I know the situation in the early sixties reflected very
much the public reaction to school integration and didn't really
translate itself into a division politically. It was all members of the
Democratic Party, those who were segregationists and those who were not
stayed in the Party. Now we are getting into a situation where those who
are outspoken segregationists have moved into another party.