Thoughts on the likelihood of changing race relations without federal intervention
Calvin and Elizabeth Kytle ruminate about the likelihood of changing race relations in the South had there not been federal intervention with the <cite>Brown</cite> decision in 1954. Noting that prior to 1954, they had not foreseen the possibility of this kind of federal regulation, both Calvin and Elizabeth Kytle seem to believe that prevailing southern attitudes would have prevented real change from occuring with any degree of immediacy during those years.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with Calvin Kytle, January 19, 1991. Interview A-0365. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
Do you all think, speaking personally, that when you think back to '48,
'50 and '52, did you see the Brown decision coming?
Did you see the federal government getting ready to change the
policies?
- ELIZABETH KYTLE:
-
I didn't.
- JOHN EGERTON:
-
And if you didn't then it would be safe to say, wouldn't it, that the
vast majority of the people didn't, white or black? It was an
unthinkable thought almost, wasn't it, that it would actually come to
that?
- CALVIN KYTLE:
-
I think at that time what we hoped, of course, there would be equal
opportunity.
- ELIZABETH KYTLE:
-
You mean, you hoped that's what would really happen. What you wanted and
what you thought would happen.
- CALVIN KYTLE:
-
I'm sure Harold [Fleming] would have a much better idea of this than I. I
wasn't really studying policy at that time. Harold was.
- JOHN EGERTON:
-
Do you think now if the South had gotten what it was asking for
essentially, "leave us alone and we will work this out, we will
make separate equal, we will treat people right." Do you think
it ever would have happened?
- ELIZABETH KYTLE:
-
I don't, but that's personality again. I don't think anybody has ever
done anything when they were let alone. Nobody has ever done anything as
long as people were nice about it. I don't think anybody has made any
progress at all as long they were oppressed or quiet.
- JOHN EGERTON:
-
So, what it really comes down to is this notion that I began our
conversation with, that this was a time when voluntary social change was
possible, that's a naive view, isn't it? It really wasn't possible in
any practical sense. The South was not truly going to make social change
in any major way voluntarily. As we look back on the period of '45 and
'50 it seems it might have had a great opportunity. Practically speaking
it didn't really, did it?
- ELIZABETH KYTLE:
-
I wouldn't dare answer that because I've lived--my
health has been rotten-shut in and I haven't been out in the
real world much. I just don't believe that anybody behaves better until
they have to. You know, it wasn't nice people who started the American
Revolution, it was a bunch of waterfront toughs. I
think we have to be grateful to the rude people who would do that. I
don't think anybody has made any advance as long as they were quiet
about being mistreated.
You were talking about leadership. Maybe if there had been that they
would have gone along with it. I don't know.
- CALVIN KYTLE:
-
Here's an interesting question. I'm just wondering if there could have
been any changes in the economics of the South that would have been
conducive to voluntary change? I've always been impressed by the
difference between Atlanta and Birmingham in the 50s. I think in
contrasting the Coca Cola Company and U.S. Steel there is a lesson in
that somewhere because Coca Cola got to be more and more concerned about
the black market. I think it had to have to some kind of solution.
- ELIZABETH KYTLE:
-
If it had worked out it would have been a lot easier and pleasanter. I
very often think that we let things get so bad that we can't fix it,
ever.