White citizens of Detroit and southern politicians worked together to get Foreman fired
Foreman lost his job as director of defense housing when his enemies from the South cooperated with Polish residents of Detroit to protest a proposed housing development for black defense workers. He resigned and worked for the navy instead.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with Clark Foreman, November 16, 1974. Interview B-0003. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- JACQUELYN HALL:
-
Tell me what you did as director of defense housing and how you lost your
position.
- CLARK FOREMAN:
-
In defense housing we had the job of getting housing built for defense
workers. We could operate directly in those places where there was no
local housing authority. Where there was a local housing authority, that
was done through Strauss, the administrator of the USHA. In Detroit, for
instance . . . it was almost an exception . . . . There was a great
demand for houses for Negroes in the defense plants there. I don't know
why they didn't want to go through the housing authority, then through
the USHA, but they came to us. As I remember it, we got the housing
authority and the mayor to recommend a number
of sites from which we chose one. On that site was to be built what
later on became called the Sojourner Truth houses.
- JACQUELYN HALL:
-
Who suggested that name?
- CLARK FOREMAN:
-
I don't know. I didn't have anything to do with that. That was all done
locally. There was great opposition on the part of the Polish Catholics
who lived nearest this site to having Negroes move in there. Although it
was an industrial area and nobody lived close to it. But they objected,
raised good deal of complaint through their Congressman and so forth. I
took the position, well, this is the site that was recommended by the
mayor and the local housing authority. And its not up to us in
Washington to tell them they don't know what they're doing.
The Congressman joined up with my enemies from
the South-a good many of which I had accumulated by that time
because of the Negro situation and because of the power
situation-so that the Lanham Committee-so-called
because the chairman was Cong. Lanham. He called over the representative
of the head of the Federal Works Agency and told him that there wouldn't
be any money for defense housing as long as Clark Foreman was the
chairman of the division. John Carmody, if he had still been there,
would have told him to go fly a kite, you know, and Secretary Ickes
would have run them right out of the office, too. But by this time the
war was on and it was a general there in charge. John Carmody had been
moved to the Maritime Comm. who had been the head of the Federal Works
Agency. The general gave in and he called me in and said "Look,
when I took this job you offered to resign and I urged you to stay on.
But now on the basis of this committee's action, I would like to accept
your resignation." So I said okay. He said "I want you
to stay on. I'd be glad to give you any other job that you think of in
the agency." I said "Well, what did
you have in mind?" He said "Post-war public works
planning." I said "Well, the war is just started. We
don't know whether there's going to be any postwar public works or not.
I'd rather get in there and work to win the war than talk about
post-war." So I went to work for the Navy. I was sent to
England to work over there in the Admiralty. When that happened, I asked
TarletonCollier, who had been the secretary in
Kentucky, to take over as acting president. He did. So while I was in
England for a year, Tarleton Collier was the president.
- JACQUELYN HALL:
-
Who were your enemies in the South who brought pressure?
- CLARK FOREMAN:
-
Well the worst one was Cong. Boykin of Mobile, Alabama. He had urged me
to appoint his brother as the custodian of one of the housing projects.
I had him investigated and the report came back that he was a thoroughly
unreliable scapegoat. So I wouldn't appoint him. This made Boykin
furious, you see, and he set out to get me, so to speak. So he was very
irate. But also Sen.George didn't bear any love for me because of the
campaign in 1938 there. He had connections in the Civil Service
Commission. Cong. Ramspeck had gone there and he was a close friend of
George's. So there were a good many people who felt that I was a
dangerous radical. There seems always to have been.