Local identity and increased taxes threatened Charlotte's consolidation
Brookshire offers another explanation of why consolidation of city-county services failed in Charlotte and Mecklenburg County. County residents feared a loss of identity and an increase in taxes despite arguments to the contrary.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with Stanford Raynold Brookshire, August 18, 1975. Interview B-0067. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- BILL MOYE:
-
I remember from reading a bit on the Jacksonville consolidation and one
or two people here in Charlotte have commented, too, that perhaps a
mistake that was made...Seems that in Jacksonville, they had
organized pretty cohesively before the...I forgot what they
called the charter commission. I believe it was the Local Government
Study Commission...Before they'd actually started
work, you might say, they had organized a good deal of support and had
gotten their war chest up, as it were, for the
campaign. It was done differently here in Charlotte. I'm, to
an extent, wondering why... A lot of people see consolidation
votes and these sorts of referenda as real political fights and not
something people, you know, sit down and think about and say,
"This will give us better planning, and this will give us
better services, and this sort of thing," unless its a crisis.
It's a real organized political fight. It seemed that, in
Charlotte, maybe the organization came too late, or by the time the
organization came a lot of people were upset with what was being
proposed. I'm, in a way, you know, wondering why in
Charlotte, having some knowledge of the Jacksonville situation, it
wasn't done, you might say, closer to the example of
Jacksonville.
- STANFORD RAYNOLD BROOKSHIRE:
-
I don't know. We had sent delegations, of course, to both
Jacksonville and Nashville to study their consolidation efforts and the
results. I think those who went to both cities were convinced that a
single government was the ideal government for a county like Mecklenburg
that had two-thirds, three-fourths of its population, I guess, within
the city limits. Well, let me tell you where some other opposition to it
came also. The five small towns, incorporated towns in Mecklenburg were
not enthusiastic at all about consolidation. They thought they might
lose their own identity even though there was provision that
they'd continue to, they could continue to operate as
corporate cities. Then, too, the rural voters in Mecklenburg County felt
like they might be saddled with heavier taxes
to support the larger government without getting the benefits that would
be comensurate with the services rendered. That in spite of the fact
that there was provision for tax districts which, in theory at least,
would lay the taxes on the basis of services rendered in a given area of
the city and county. In other words, the county residents would not have
to pay for any services they weren't getting, municipal type
services.
- BILL MOYE:
-
There was an urban services district and sort of a county services
district. The idea was you'd be paying comensurate with the
services that you...
- STANFORD RAYNOLD BROOKSHIRE:
-
That's right, but maybe that wasn't explained
carefully enough, or wasn't sold, at least.