Anger at unions and government regulation
Evidently frustrated about the effects of regulation, Cone passionately complains that unions and government involvement in business damage the marketplace in this excerpt. Unions demand too much compensation for their members; government regulation stifles new businesses and encourages workers to file frivolous lawsuits which hamstring employers. Cone seems quite irritated with the ease with which Americans can sue employers.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with Caesar Cone, January 7, 1983. Interview C-0003. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- HARRY WATSON:
-
What would be the effect if there was industry-wide unionization in
textiles?
- CEASAR CONE:
-
You'd have the same problem you've got with steel
and automobiles. You'd have things pushed to the point where
we'd all be out of business, and Japan
would be taking the whole thing over. As low as textile wages are,
we're still in a hell of a fix from all this import stuff.
And we're way low, compared to what you see up here in
automobiles and steel. Why the hell should those folks make twenty-five
or thirty dollars an hour, with fringes, and our folks make only about
eight or nine with fringes? How they expect to sell automobiles to the
eight- or nine-dollar-an-hour guy, and they're going to get
twenty-odd dollars themselves, and that's what
you've got in this country. The places where the union has
pushed the hardest and management went along because they could sell
anything at any price right after the War has just screwed up the
so-called marketplace idea. And the same thing's true with
capital. You don't make the return on capital in textiles you
were making. Now we're still going along, and
they're trying to get concessions, getting back off this damn
high plateau. And it's creating a hell of a problem with the
unions, because the unions don't want to go to the folks and
say, "Look, you were getting too damn much. You'd
better be willing to work at a hell of a lot less." But the
problem is, those folks now, "We'll either get
twenty dollars, or we won't work at all." I
don't know. I'm rather bearish on where we go from
here. The whole setup is… Government has gotten into the
economy, the society, to an extent where in a democracy it's
most difficult. Now a communistic setup, I don't care whether
it's a dictatorship of the right or a dictatorship of the
left… To me, it's necessary to at least have a
line of command and responsibility on the part of people to take orders
from people. I mean we've gotten to the point now, every time
an employer hires anybody, he's subject
to a lawsuit. You don't know where you are. Government
can't tell you. We're a democracy. You go to the
labor department and say, "I want to hire ten people."
How many blacks, how many whites, how many young, how many old, how many
lame, how many female. To keep from being in trouble. And the department
of labor says, "We're sorry, Mr. Cone. You know, we
can't tell you what to do. The law says so-and-so. But
everybody has a right to sue, no matter what you do. If you go by the
law, it's up to the court to decide whether you did or
didn't. Chances are, if they sue"—
if they sue"!;when they
sue—"you'll be all right." Well,
how in the heck, if you're starting in business today, are
you going to put your money on the line, and hire anybody, running into
that kind of a possibility? I mean, that's just who you hire
or who you don't hire. You see, that was never on any books
up until ten, fifteen, twenty years ago. You could hire anybody you
wanted and fire anybody you wanted. And unfortunately, the guy that you
hire today can leave you any bright day he wants to and find another
job. He's not hooked. See, that is involuntary servitude, for
him to agree that he'll stay with you irrespective. But you,
as the employer, are up against all these daggone possible suits. Out
here at this school I went to, I was on the board. They let a fellow go
that was a teacher out there, and hell, he's suing the school
right now. We've already paid $5,000 to a lawyer at
this point. The government investigated and said nothing to it, but the
guy still has a right to sue you through the courts, you see. I never
knew this guy, but he was of Polish descent, Gabrowski or something like
that, and a Catholic. One year the fellow at the last
minute didn't come back, and so they went to
this employment agency for professional people. He came down here for a
year and didn't get along with the folks, and they let him
go. Well, now he's suing, based on the fact that they fired
him because he was Polish and a Catholic. Well, they hired him in the
first place knowing he was Polish and a Catholic, but you see
that's no defense. And the institution out there has spent
$5,000 already fighting the damn thing. And this is a
non-profit setup. Well, you can see it in the papers every day, some of
these lawsuits.
- HARRY WATSON:
-
Oh, yes.
- CEASAR CONE:
-
It inhibits anybody wanting to start a business today. Frankly, I
don't see anybody starting his own business anymore, with all
the obligations. Now you don't know whether you're
going to make it or not in the first place, but you've got
all these obligations to anybody you even talk to, almost. If you
don't hire somebody, he'll come along and say,
"You didn't hire me because I was this, that, or the
other." And here you are, before you've even
started, up against all these extra costs. The labor unions
can't meet their commitments. They've got no more
power to make a guy work for you, if he doesn't want to, than
you have. Involuntary servitude, that's slavery. And I
don't think they should. But on the other hand,
you've got all these daggone
guarantees, and you've got the possibility that
you'll get sued. It's not only a question of who
you hire and who you don't hire, but who gets sick and when
they get sick. Lord knows, they tell me, some of these asbestos people
now… Forty years down the road, somebody gets sick with
cancer, and you know there are going to be cancer
people, probably, forty years down the road. They'll say,
"Oh, well, my father worked with cancer when I was a little
boy, and therefore he came home with the dust on him, and I got it now
forty years down the road." They'll sue somebody, if
he can find him. I mean, it's something.