Integrating Clemson University in 1963
Gantt discusses his effort to transfer from Iowa State to Clemson, which excluded African Americans. After Clemson administrators discouraged him from moving, he filed suit. The State of South Carolina fought Gantt's admission and Gantt fought back with financial aid from the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. Finally the Supreme Court rejected the state's position and Gantt was allowed to enroll.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with Harvey B. Gantt, January 6, 1986. Interview C-0008. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- LYNN HAESSLY:
-
Let me turn back and ask you about what the process was that enabled you
to enter Clemson.
- HARVEY B. GANTT:
-
Well, after so many different efforts to get in at the beginning of the
sophomore year at Iowa, I mean the latter part of freshman year at Iowa.
Ultimately, I left Iowa State in the first quarter of my junior year,
having filed a suit the previous summer, after we had tried on three
different occasions for each semester to get in to it and being given
different kinds of excuses.
- LYNN HAESSLY:
-
Who was "we"? You said "we" had tried
to get in.
- HARVEY B. GANTT:
-
My lawyer and I. The first time I started this, I did it on my own and I
sensed that they would do it. They sent me catalogs and nice things
about Clemson. They delighted to have it in an application. I filled the
application out and then we had trouble. The application then signalled
that this was not a usual application because it was coming from a
student who was at Iowa State who attended Burke High School in
Charleston, South Carolina. Burke was known as a black school, so he had
to be a black student. I got a letter back essentially saying,
"hey, we notice you are doing very well at Iowa State.
You're getting some state aid to go to school there, plus you
are on a scholarship. Enjoy yourself!" Then I got mad. I went
back and said, "but you don't understand. I want to
go school there." The same lawyer that assisted us, Matthew
Perry, in the sit-in case in high school when we
met at the march. I remembered his name; called him up; and told him
what I'd done. He said, "Great! Now, from now on,
just send me a copy of all the letters you send them, a copy of all the
letters they send back to you. And we'll see if we
can't develop a file and if we can pursue it." And
that's what happened.
- LYNN HAESSLY:
-
Now, the case that led up to the Brown decision had
been very much orchestrated by the Legal Defense Fund and they were
bringing suits all over the country. Your decision to enter Clemson was
not a part of that.
- HARVEY B. GANTT:
-
People keep wanting to make it that. No, it was not a part of that grand
design. It really wasn't. I never had anybody to talk to me
about doing that or even thinking about doing that. A lot of people have
wondered about that all these years. Stories about Harvey going to Iowa
State as a kind of training for going to Clemson, and that it was
planned by the Legal Defense Fund, but that is not true, absolutely not
true, never was.
- LYNN HAESSLY:
-
Did you get any support from the NAACP after you began to file your
suit?
- HARVEY B. GANTT:
-
Oh, the Legal Defense Fund took the case over once it had gotten to the
point where it was clear that they were going to resist my application.
We sought to exhaust all the administrative avenues we could force. And
after Perry took the case, after about the third or fourth exchange of
letters, and I think the state then knew that we would be getting some
legal help.
- LYNN HAESSLY:
-
He was with the Legal Defense Fund?
- HARVEY B. GANTT:
-
He had his own law practice but he was like Julius Chambers. He was
really employed by the Legal Defense Fund for a lot of the cases in
South Carolina.
- LYNN HAESSLY:
-
So they paid the legal fees.
- HARVEY B. GANTT:
-
They paid our legal fees. My family didn't have to pay it;
they couldn't afford it. I could not have afforded to do
that. Let's see. We proceeded to file it in district court in
Anderson, South Carolina, and that was heard on its merit and the
federal district judge ruled that Clemson was not guilty. So we took it
to the court of appeals in less than three or four weeks, trying it in
January of 1963 . And the court of appeals said,
"yes, you did discriminate. You've got to admit
him." Then the State of South Carolina took it to the Supreme
Court and they refused to hear it and that ended the case. What was
remarkable about the whole thing was that it was like a charade; I mean,
the state was going through the motions that had to be gone through in
order to satisfy the people of South Carolina, or at least a portion of
the people of South Carolina, that they had exhausted every legal remedy
available to them before they let the gates open that would never be
closed again.