Minimizing ideological differences between himself and Jesse Helms
Holshouser reflects on the ideological division between himself and Jesse Helms, a divide he downplays. As he considers political style, he offers thoughts on his own approach, which emphasized compromise and consensus-building, a strategy he came to believe in as a member of the minority party in North Carolina.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with James E. Holshouser Jr., January 31, 1998. Interview C-0328-1. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- JACK FLEER:
-
Right, right. Now you mentioned that once you got past the two primaries
and was in fact the nominee of the party that you began to coordinate
with the presidential and the US Senatorial campaign of Senator Helms.
But you also mentioned that in a sense Senator Helms was representative
of the faction or component of the party that you had just defeated in
the sense that, if I am understanding this correctly, it was a more
conservative element of the party. Can you talk a little bit about that
or did I misread?
- JAMES E. HOLSHOUSER, JR.:
-
And it tells you it is awfully easy to want to make that simplistic and
want to make broad generalizations and it doesn't really hold
because there was an awful lot of people that were for Helms and for me
also in the primaries. Sim DeLapp and Charlie Jonas you recall had been
the co-chairs of the Helms campaign and they both endorsed me in the
runoff. If you looked around at the Helms' chairmen in the
western part of the state in particular, there were an awful lot of
those that were involved in our campaign in the primary.
- JACK FLEER:
-
In the primary?
- JAMES E. HOLSHOUSER, JR.:
-
So you can't really say that there were these two camps out
there that were so well defined that there wasn't any overlap
or cross breeding or whatever. It just wasn't so.
- JACK FLEER:
-
And yet you had taken in a sense from what you mentioned earlier and had
developed a reputation as being sort of a moderate Republican, a person
who was open to listening to other peoples' ideas and Jesse
Helms had at that time I think still today, had to some extent of a
reputation as being a more ideological candidate. Was that a source of
difficulty in coordinating these campaigns?
- JAMES E. HOLSHOUSER, JR.:
-
Well it's sort of a funny thing. I don't keep up
with all the votes in Congress but I have the impression that Senator
Helms and I are a lot closer on 90% of the issues than most people would
ever think. Our styles are just very different. I am not nearly as
confrontational as he is. I always viewed myself as somebody who tried
to build a consensus, which means some compromising along the way. I
think Jesse has also over the time he's been in Washington
has become a very skillful compromiser to get the key elements of things
that he thinks are important. That wasn't as apparent early
on and frankly it wasn't as viable a strategy because when
you a minority trying to build a consensus is much more difficult than
when you are majority.
- JACK FLEER:
-
Why is that?
- JAMES E. HOLSHOUSER, JR.:
-
Because you don't have the votes. And when you are a committee
chairman it makes a lot of difference. And I think in my own experience
one of the things that I have found as governor was that because I knew
the legislature and the legislative people and as importantly they knew
me. They knew that I would stand by what I said and I knew which ones
would stand by what they said and which ones wouldn't. We
knew how to build a consensus in the legislature even when we
didn't have a Republican majority there. And I think that was
very important in having some success in legislative programs.