Ethics in the governor's mansion
Holshouser recalls that he brought his personal ethical standards to the governor's mansion, but also that he did things that later many people would have considered inappropriate, such as his use of the state plane. Holshouser points out a number of different factors that come into play when weighing ethics in politics, including the inevitability that someone in a large administration will likely do something fishy; that publicity seems to determine the severity of the offense; and that it is important to retain a staff member who keeps track of potential misdoings.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with James E. Holshouser Jr., June 4, 1998. Interview C-0328-4. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
Can you talk a little bit about what kind of ethical
code you brought to the office of governor?
- JAMES E. HOLSHOUSER, JR.:
-
Well I think you start off with your own personal standard. It is sort of
interesting because looking back I suspect even that changes with people
from time to time over the passage of time. Maybe
there is a better way to say that. That also gets affected by things
that were out of your control. If you have a major scandal in another
state or in Washington about a specific thing that makes everybody in
every state more likely to set up and pay attention. We did things that
everybody accepted as fairly standard at the time that today probably
wouldn't be. (I) used the state plane a lot for things that
people don't, I shouldn't say people
don't let you do, but its become politically unwise to do any
more. Never had the sense that we were taking public money to put in our
own pocket because I made the determination early on in politics that if
you are honest you couldn't get rich in politics, you
probably lost money. And you shouldn't ever let that get to
be a factor. I think you also had to figure that as the first Republican
in administration, I thought it was especially important that we not get
a black eye. The jury is still out at this point on whether that may
happen with our legislative folks or not. And if it turns out that they
do get a black eye, and to a certain extent they have got a black eye
already just in fact that there has been as much publicity as there has
about it. And I think they let the party down in this strictly partisan
sense. In the broader political sense, they have let the governmental
process down by having it appear that there is too much wheeling and
dealing.
- JACK FLEER:
-
And you are referring to the fact that the Republicans are in majority in
the house and some action that has been in relation to the decisions
there?
- JAMES E. HOLSHOUSER, JR.:
-
Right. Some of the accusations that have been made, if they are proven
true and so far they haven't been it appears. And I generally
told people they shouldn't do anything they
wouldn't want on the front page of the newspaper.
- JACK FLEER:
-
Did you feel the standard was higher for the first Republican
administration?
- JAMES E. HOLSHOUSER, JR.:
-
I did.
- JACK FLEER:
-
Yes.
- JAMES E. HOLSHOUSER, JR.:
-
I would hope that if I had been the fifth Republican I would still have
thought the standard ought to be the same and keep it high. But I
can't measure that.
- JACK FLEER:
-
Right.
- JAMES E. HOLSHOUSER, JR.:
-
And I had always felt that the public in general had a feeling that there
was something a little unsavory about politics. I remember talking to
some of my mentors in the mountains about that, about whether you could
actually get into it with both feet up to your ears so to speak without
getting tangled yourself. That is harder today than it was when I was
around I think because of the attack mode of the campaigns. When we
talked before one of the things that I didn't mentioned that
I probably should have is that despite the fact that Gene Anderson got
some bad publicity during our administration, I think Gene felt one of
his jobs was to keep his antenna out there, and his ears and eyes open,
and have people talk to him about whether something was happening in one
of the agencies that it was going to be an embarrassment. Somebody doing
something wrong. And just periodically he would come in and say I think
you need to take a look about this, something is happening. And I think
he never did get any credit for that. It wasn't a public
thing but it was very important in terms of keeping the
administration's record clean.
- JACK FLEER:
-
Is it?
- JAMES E. HOLSHOUSER, JR.:
-
What I did find is this though. When you have got 60,000 people out there
working for the state a few of them are going to screw up every day and
the guy at the top eventually answers for all of
that. It just depends on the degree the press gets interested as to how
much publicity that gets.
- JACK FLEER:
-
You mentioned Gene Anderson's role. It is necessary do you
think and is it generally the case that an administration will have
someone or should have someone who will sort of blow the whistle
whenever that kind of potential difficulty occurs?
- JAMES E. HOLSHOUSER, JR.:
-
I think it is. I think somebody can. Sometimes it just happens because of
the personalities and Phil Kirk shared that sense of responsibility but
just in a slightly different way. It is sort of hard to explain and I am
not sure that I can. Both of them felt an obligation to sort of keep
their eyes and ears open. If you don't have something like
that, then if the governor is doing his job he is out there being the
spokesman for the state and looking at policy and this sort of thing.
Something will just reach up and just bite you from behind in case you
don't have time to personally oversee all of this stuff. So
part of your own protection of yourself is to have somebody who is doing
these things that you don't have time to do.