Problems with bipartisanship among the Democratic Party hardliners in North Carolina
Hunt's embrace of bipartisanship met with some opposition from the hardliners in his party. He insists however that his strong and forceful presence as governor helped him keep mainstream Democrats in line.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with James B. Hunt, October 3, 2001. Interview C-0332. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- JACK FLEER:
-
Personal, well being, or their family's well-being. I want to
switch to talking about your role as a political party leader and as
governor. Was it important to you to be and to be seen as the leader of
the Democratic Party when you were governor?
- JAMES B. HUNT:
-
Yes.
- JACK FLEER:
-
Could you explain it?
- JAMES B. HUNT:
-
Well, I think our system of government is well served by a strong
two-party system. You have a strong two party system. In fact
we're better for it. While I say to you that it is important,
it is also important that the governor be bigger than just his party.
You have to have, develop bipartisan [support]. You have to work with
people of different parties. You should try to develop bipartisan
support for things when you can. But the fact is you, your party is the
group that worked hardest to elect you, support you strongly, believes
in you, will go to the wall for you if you're a strong party
leader. Now I, of course, came up through the party. My first activities
were in Young Democrats. I wrote the state party precinct manual,
‘Rally Around the Precinct’. I canvassed every
house in my precinct and got involved with the people and talking with
them and so forth. I was state president of Young Democrats and led the
first sort of party reform effort in North Carolina which included
recommending voting eighteen-year-olds and full participation by
minorities and women and so forth. I was maybe the last governor that
came along to come up through the party ranks going out and speaking to
party organizations in all counties of North Carolina. As I look back on
it I think it was a great advantage because I got to go to people out
there, where they were. Television and media today is, was very
important. You can probably win without going to counties. I
don't think you should. I don't think
you're as good a governor as if you'd been out.
You shouldn't just work out in the across the state, through
the party. That shouldn't be the only thing you do. I did
agricultural groups and education groups, especially in recent years
environmental groups and safety groups and on and on. But your question
was about party leadership, and I think it strengthens you a great deal
if you're strong in your party. For them
to be behind you they have to know you, have worked with you, see their
success as yours.
Now but there are limits to that, and I'll give you an
example. Parties tend to be one side of the spectrum. There are many
people within a party that just want you to be very orthodox, very
extreme their way. So moderate Republicans in this state often times
aren't appreciated by very conservative, maybe far right of
the party. I could always tell in the Democratic Party that my pushing
for punishment of criminals, my strong stand on that including support
of capital punishment (that) all the liberals in my party, the very most
extreme liberals, always felt like I wasn't quite one of them
because I wasn't. My closeness to business, my understanding
of how you have to make the economy work, working with business and
seeing that we had an environment in which they could locate and prosper
and provide jobs. That didn't sit well with some people in my
party. I know that. There were issues that we had a great deal in common
on.
- JACK FLEER:
-
Who were the maybe not naming people but naming positions who were the
challengers? Where did the challenge for leadership of the party for you
come from, legislative leaders?
- JAMES B. HUNT:
-
Yeah. I don't think the challengers were ever very strong.
They came certainly when I was first elected governor. That's
when people need to give Mike Easley some running room. I remember how
tough it was when I started. Unfairly people kind of compare him to me
at the end of sixteen years. But yeah we had some
pretty—I'll name one name, but we had a group of
people within the legislature that were pretty conservative.
I'm talking about Democrats. They didn't want to
do a lot of these things. They didn't want to put a lot of
money into it. But when I got my Excellence in
Schools Act through, when I got my Smart Start program through I, of
course, was successful in part because the business leadership supported
those issues. They would be impressive to the conservatives of the
legislature particularly the Democrats. Now what developed of course
later was the Republicans in the legislature were so tightly bound
together. It was very hard to get any bipartisan support. I did that on
the Excellence in Schools Act. But it got harder and harder. You can see
right now with the pledge they signed today. But that's not
just on that issue. You had that kind of feel on lots of other issues.
So I did have some challenge from conservative leaders in the
legislature. I had some challenges to my leadership on public safety
issues from Speaker Blue. When I called the special crime session in
'94 whenever it was, he and Bob Hensley and Martin Nesbitt
and a group of those people strongly opposed many of the bills that I
got through. I think I proposed thirty-six bills. Thirty-two of them
passed. We had a knock down drag out about getting it through. So I had
people sort of on the liberal members of the legislature who were
opposing me on crime and public safety issues. I had more conservative
people who didn't want to make the big jumps for children and
education that I thought were important. Then I had people—I
remember Harold Hardison whom I respected and I worked with closely in
the early years—boy, he fought environmental legislation
tooth and nail as did many others. I had to deal with them getting that
Clean Air Act through that we got through two years ago. It was
accomplished that was little noted, but an amazing accomplishment to the
truth of the fact. So that was where the main, as I said within the
party ranks when it came to picking party chairman, state chairmen,
things of that sort, there would be grumbles. The governor's
trying to run it, but they never amounted to much. People knew my party
credentials. They supported me on most issues. They
appreciated my active leadership in the party, helping raise money for
the party and that sort of thing.