Successes and failures in organizing workers for Amalgamated
Russell discusses successes and failures in organizing workers in North Carolina under the Amalgamated Meat Cutters. Here, as elsewhere in the interview, Russell explains that the 1955 merger was somewhat limiting for the more radical activists of the former Fur and Leather Workers. Nevertheless, he argues that he almost always had the supported of Amalgamated in organizing workers and in determining whether or not strikes were necessary.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with John Russell, July 19, 1975. Interview E-0014-3. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- WILLIAM FINGER:
-
When you started organizing and building this union from three hundred
people on up to four thousand, did you feel isolated in North Carolina,
or did you get good support from the amalgamated?
- JOHN RUSSELL:
-
Yes, we got good support. I can't quarrel. I can't
quarrel with the support we got, I don't say we got every
kind of support we should have got. There were times we should have had
strike sanction coming and we should have got it without any hindrances.
We got it, but it was always a conditioned deal. Instead of saying,
here's strike sanction for you people, now we've
got enough respect for you, we know you and understand you, you go ahead
and if you have to make the strike, you make the strike. I
don't have that problem now. First of all, Don Smith is a guy
who unequivocally says, okay you got a strike, here's my
sanction. That, of course, is okayed by the international. I got it out
of Leon in practically every place. Maybe it was because Leon
didn't trust us old fur and leather wotkers any more than he
did somebody else. But we always got it eventually out of him. We always
got pretty good support out of Leon in many other ways too. I got to
hand it to this guy, I may disagree with him politically, but god damn,
he's a pretty good trade unionist.
- WILLIAM FINGER:
-
So it doesn't ever sound like you felt hindered by the
Amalgamated in a way.
- JOHN RUSSELL:
-
No, I felt hindered, but you go ahead anyway. You take your chances of
maybe doing something they'll go after you for. This is
something you had to do. You had to take your chances.
- WILLIAM FINGER:
-
How did you feel hindered?
- JOHN RUSSELL:
-
You knew that if you made big mistakes that cost them money, they could
easily make an argument, dump your butt, what you got? You
ain't got no protection.
- WILLIAM FINGER:
-
Your own job, you mean.
- JOHN RUSSELL:
-
I'm not talking about that personal part of it. But they never
bothered us. You felt it, but you go fight it. I guess everyone in their
right mind has got to consider something like this.
- WILLIAM FINGER:
-
But what was happening in the state? We talked about the international.
Things that kind of influence your work. Anything outside the
meatpacking industry? The strike, the textile strike in Henderson.
- JOHN RUSSELL:
-
The textile workers strike in Henderson cotton mills, we supported it.
Our local sent money, we sent people up there. We saw it as a very key
strike in this state. We never, that was in 1958, even though we were
individual locals, we always saw the inadequacy of having little locals
trying to develop money, they couldn't do it. Maybe this is
one of the things that helped shape our opinion on certain things. We
helped all we could, all we had the force to do. There was no question
of the impact on my thinking and a number of other
guys, Manny about losing the battle in Harriet-Henderson cotton mills.
This is one of those things. If you got a licking, you know why you got
a licking, you know what's happening. At that time you had a
merger with AFL-CIO for about four years. You'd hoped for a
lot more, and you didn't see it. I don't think it
broke any backs, it didn't ours at least. We got a licking
there and went on and did our own thing.
- WILLIAM FINGER:
-
It broke textile's back in a big way.
- JOHN RUSSELL:
-
I'm not saying it didn't. It all depends.
I'm sure all the money they spent, all the time, all the
energy, losing it was a tremendous demoralizing factor for many many
years. We lost tremendous struggles too. Our union in many other areas.
You know here. But you don't say, what the hell,
I'm going to fold up and quit working. You don't
do that. I see that out of the Henderson Cotton Mill strike, the same
thing we see out of a Rose Hill, or the same thing we saw out of a
Southeastern, or the same thing we saw out of Carolina Meat, or the same
thing we saw out of the Gerber strike, it was right here. We do a lot of
things you don't count up in terms of money, you
don't maybe even count it up in terms of what we get in the
contract. You establish your credibility with every employer. When I
wrote an article a couple of months ago in our paper, where we said, we
want to tell all the employers, we're not a strike-happy
union, we're not foolish. But if strikes are necessary,
that's what we're going to do. I pointed out to
them, that in 1973 or 1972, a couple of them, Colonial Stores,
that thought they could just disregard the real,
legitimate demands of the workers, and they had to face struggles. In
seventy-five and seventy-six, we hope they'll take a
realistic look. But if they don't, we'll consider
seventy-five and seventy-six as strike years too. That's how
we feel. We're not going to run away from it. If
we're going to have struggles, we're going to have
them, that's all there is to it. I don't know of
any better way to educate workers than through struggles.
- WILLIAM FINGER:
-
Do you think the people are willing to go with that too?
- JOHN RUSSELL:
-
Oh, I think so.