Confrontation between students during the food workers' strike
Davis continues his discussion of how the food workers' strike manifested itself in tensions between students at University of North Carolina. In particular, Davis focuses on an incident when the Black Student Movement (BSM) and the Southern Student Organizing Committee (SSOC) had caught wind that conservative white students were going to begin physically harassing the food workers and the students who supported them. In response, the BSM and SSOC demonstrated their unwillingness to back down during a brief skirmish in the cafeteria. According to Davis, this was one of the very few instances of "violence" between students during the strike.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with Ashley Davis, April 12, 1974. Interview E-0062. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
One day, what happened in Lenoir, it finally came to a head,
because we had our people, something started in there and some football
players came into the cafeteria and they began to…I think
that it started out because we had SSOC people and some other people
sitting in the cafeteria, just sitting in chairs, occupying seats. They
would go up and buy a drink, or some crunch, or some dessert or
something, just sitting in the seats. And we did fill half the cafeteria
like that. And we had the cafeteria closed for awhile, and then they
reopened and we had this other thing with people sitting in there and we
were still picketing out around the cafeteria and going in the mornings
and stuff. And then the major development that happened then, it got
real bad when these football boys, and some other people, as I
understand it, were going to eject some of the SSOC people and that came
to a big head. It came down to the case where we understood that some
white students were going to band together and attack us, like at
Manning as such. You know what I mean?
- RUSSELL RYMER:
-
The BSM?
- ASHLEY DAVIS:
-
Yeah. Well, attack, like individually, that's what I mean.
This is what we came to understand. And see, the way the University was
handling this situation, the campus police, and the white students, and
I still say this today, the white students could do about anything.
Without question. It is my firm belief that if some white students
attacked some black students and beat that black student to
death… look at James cates there. The University did nothing
at all. I remember that even we had a hassle later on about that because
if they had a list of black people in Chapel Hill that they
wouldn't let come on campus and the names of the Storm
Troopers wasn't up there. Now, we asked Dean specifically why
those names weren't up there. In that one instance,
I'm just trying to pick for you how…the
administration then, you had in there as Dean of Students, and Dean
, you'll get to see him in a minute, he
really just was not responsive at all. His background was as a preacher
and he just wasn't responsive. The University hierarchy was
not responsive. Not at all. It didn't want to deal with the
problem. It just wanted to forget the problem. Well, you
don't forget problems, let me tell you. So, we came into the
cafeteria, we came in there and we were pretty mad. We were told that
these people were going to start some trouble and we were pretty mad.
So, we went through from one end to the other end and just cleared the
old cafeteria, a few tables flying and the campus
police were there, and they stood there.
- RUSSELL RYMER:
-
Would you really call it violence, though?
- ASHLEY DAVIS:
-
In terms of the system, sure it was violent. We didn't hurt
anybody, we didn't plan to hurt anybody. We just wanted to
let people know that we weren't going to let the people from
SSOC, who worked with us, be hurt. We weren't going to let
cafeteria workers be hurt, we had heard at that time that there were
certain students who…and I believe that we had students with
that mentality then and now, who would hurt a worker. Because I
don't think that students really even attempted to
understand. A lot of stuff was just plain reaction and the reaction is,
"I'm not going to let you blacks come up here and
take over our University. We were doing so well before you got here and
we'll do well when you leave here. So, you're
fortunate to be here, …" I think that's
the main thing, the "fortunate to be here" part. It
doesn't matter if your taxes are paying for it, or that the
University is taking over black man's land through escheats
or other things, it doesn't matter. "You are lucky
to be here." And this attitude, I think it just prevailed on
the whole campus, if not outwardly, then inwardly. Well, so we went
through and a few chairs were thrown and tables were overturned and all
the white students who were down there to make a big stand with pitchers
and stuff, moved back out. O.K., and that was all. We came back through
the cafeteria and went back over to Manning Hall.
- RUSSELL RYMER:
-
So, there was actually a confrontation down there?
- ASHLEY DAVIS:
-
It wasn't really a confrontation. The white kids
didn't try to confront us. I think that what happened, the
white kids, and I found this to be true at that time, that white people
really bothered me so much then and I could hardly understand it, that
they could be so insensitive to things and to have such great egos. I
mean, they just would tear me up. How can people so insensitive, I mean,
you can tell that there was real racism involved, people going into that
cafeteria early, and people serving them food and stuff, and they
don't even see them. For some of them, the people serving
them in that cafeteria might as well be robots. They weren't
even human to these people. And then that ego, "what are you
doing to our University?" "Why do you
students want to do this?"
"Don't you know why you come to
school?"