Efforts to undermine the suffrage movement with personal character assaults
Clark discusses how one tactic to undermine the women's suffrage movement involved attacks on the personal character of its leaders. Earlier in the interview she describes how people tried to associate Carrie Chapman Catt with the free love movement in order to smear her character. Here, she focuses on efforts to similarly attack leaders of the Equal Suffrage League of Virginia, notably Leila Mead Valentine and Mary Johnston. Her comments are revealing of gender expectations and roles during the era.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with Adele Clark, February 28, 1964. Interview G-0014-2. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- ADELE CLARK:
-
The undertones were particularly unpleasant, but they were very much
modified in Virginia by the fact that Leila Mead Valentine was not only
a woman of great social leadership in her own personally, but her
husband was a member of a very distinguished family in Virginia and of a
very prominent business firm, the Valentine Meat Juice Company, and the
Valentine Museum here was founded by that group. Mrs. Valentine was
above even any effort to say anything against her because of her social
position and that of her husband. But there was a terrific lot
of talking about the childless woman, which was
exceptionally cruel. They couldn't say anything about Mrs.
Valentine's marriage, which was one of the few totally ideal
marriages that I've ever seen. She and her husband were not
only devoted but very congenial, and he promoted her activities in every
way. But she had had one child that had died at birth, and therefore
those of us who knew her and knew the tremendous amount of work she had
done for the visiting nurses and child welfare, and one of the first
mothers' clubs was named for her here because she had
promoted kindergarten education, we felt it was particularly cruel that
they would start off talking about the childless woman as though she was
a frustrated creature who was just doing the… But that was
about the only thing they could ever find to say about Mrs. Valentine. A
campaign of slander against Mary Johnston was started that was so
abominable that she went to Mrs. Valentine and offered to stop speaking
for suffrage if she was doing harm. At that time it was such an
unmentionable subject that we just went around and said,
"Isn't it awful that they're talking so
about Mary Johnston?" But I think in these days of open
speaking, I might as well tell the story. I don't know
whether it's ever been put down; it was just hush-hush at the
time, it was so evil. Mary Johnston was a scientist. I don't
know how much you know of her background and her writings.
- WINSTON BROADFOOT:
-
Her writings I know.
- ADELE CLARK:
-
When I mean a scientist, I mean she was a very great student of science,
and she had a marvelous and interesting mind. When she wrote about
something, she tried to get every facet before she
came to the point. I remember hearing her make a speech one time on
psychological matters as it referred to suffrage, and running back to
the fact that she'd just been reading some of the works of
St. Augustine and found out that in the fifth century he was a
psychologist, and so on. She wrote an article for the
Atlantic Monthly or Century—I
think it was the Atlantic Monthly—and she
took up the question of the beginnings of life, all biology and
everything, and she spoke of the single cell and the division of cells
and all sorts of intricate scientific things. And then to the point
where there'd been in society matriarchies and so on. She
went through from the early beginnings, scientificially mostly, about
the status of woman at the present day. Some way or other in this
article—I was too ignorant of scientific things at the time
to ever find out how they worked it out—but there were some
people who read it who read into that a discussion of biology that led
them to come up with a whispering campaign that Mary Johnston was
advocating artificial insemination, which of course isn't a
very agreeable or pleasant subject today. But at that time, in the
1909's and '10's and
'12's and along then, was a totally unmentionable
subject. And it is perfectly extraordinary to think how that thing
spread. I went with Miss Johnston to a meeting that she was allowed to
conduct at one of our department stores here, at which, in lunchtime,
the head of the department store had let her speak to the workers there
about woman's suffrage. And I did the little caddying of
handing out leaflets while Miss Johnston spoke. She was a very lovely,
delicate-looking woman and very soft-voiced, and she made the talk to
them about labor conditions and things of that
sort. And she apparently made such a pleasant impression on the head of
the department store that she was invited to come back and speak as
often as possible to the girls. Particularly she was talking about
various economic things and so on. And several weeks or a month later, I
came home one day and found an old friend of my mother's, who
was a very narrow-minded anti-suffragist. My mother was a member of the
Suffrage League, and this lady was saying to my mother that she ought
not to let me out with Miss Johnston, that she understood that Miss
Johnston had made so vulgar and unpleasant and unspeakable address to
the group at this department store that she had been asked to remove her
account and never come back to the department store again. And I turned
to this friend of my mother's, and I said, "At which
store?" So she told me—I believe it was Miller and
Rhoads—and she told me the date. And I said, "Well,
I was with Miss Johnston and handed out the leaflets. And Miss Johnston
made …
[END OF TAPE 2, SIDE A]
[TAPE 2, SIDE B]
[START OF TAPE 2, SIDE B]
- ADELE CLARK:
-
…absolutely no reference to moral or immoral questions. She
spoke almost entirely about women's educational opportunities
and economic opportunities, and the head of the department store came
and asked her to come again." So I said, "What you
heard was totally untrue." "Oh, no," she
said. "You must have either misunderstood, or she must have
said these things when you weren't listening, because I
understood that she was advising all these girls to have children by
artificial insemination." I got very
angry, and I said, "I think they probably would have preferred
knowing how to prevent children if they were irregular in their
attitudes," whereupon my mother told me I was very vulgar, and
so we stopped the conversation.
[Laughter]
But that was, to my memory, the most horrible thing, and
we've always hesitated even to put it on any record, I
suppose for fear that somebody might think that it was some semblance of
truth in it. But somebody asked Mrs. Valentine about it at some meeting,
and Mrs. Valentine said, "Mary Johnston," who was
supposed to be, and perhaps was, a free thinker, "is behaving
in a far more Christian attitude than I would have done." I
don't remember our even having very many divorcees or others
in the League, but if there were of course that was plenty brought out.
But the major thing that I recall would be the question of being
Negro-lovers.