Aftermath of the Cane Creek Conservation Authority
Crawford briefly reflects on the aftermath of the CCCA's efforts to prevent OWASA from building the dam. Although they failed at that effort, Crawford suggests that the energy of the grassroots movement later percolated in opposing the building of an airport near Chapel Hill. Here, he argues that the CCCA never actually became an institution, which is one reason they had difficulty in opposing OWASA.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with Sam Crawford, October 26, 1985. Interview K-0006. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- JUDITH WHEELER:
-
You mentioned something about an airport that was planned, did the
Authority help fight that?
- SAM CRAWFORD:
-
Well I think it was one of those things like I was just saying; that
residual political response. CCCA as an entity did not say …
It is hard to define CCCA as an entity; it was more of an idea to which
a lot of people adhere to more that it is an institution to which a lot
of people have allegiance. But I think that in having that, the people
who had gained experience and momentum from working on Cane Creek,
quickly organized around opposition with the airport and quickly made
their experiences available to people who were involved with this issue
but weren't involved with that issue. By making that
experience available to them, thus short cutting a great deal of what
they would have had to do and making the response a great deal more
successful than it would have been fifteen years ago. So in that sense,
I think we responded as an idea, and as a historical concept, not so
much as an institution. I don't think CCCA has ever really
been an institution. I think that has been in some ways its downfall,
because unlike OWASA we aren't an
institution, to the degree we can force levies and things like that on
the county. Not, I also think it has been its major strength, in the
sense it has that kinda populace magnetism and power, that
wouldn't ordinarily …
[Interruption with Flinn] So yeah, I think that is the thing
in terms of the airport that was the deciding factor in terms of our
input to that.
During this period also, and you would really have to talk to Patty more
about this than me, cause she was the Chairman of the County Planning
Commission. There was an implementation of all these zoning and
subdivisional stuff in this township. I think because issues and ideas
that had come out of Cane Creek, it [the Zoning] went in a good deal
more sensibly and the people had a lot more to say about it, and had a
lot more impact on the final presentation of that. It became more of a
document that they felt not only created but could live with. Because
zoning is a tricky issue… it is a real tricky issue. I think
because of what we had experienced - that was something that was a
positive, for the most part, rather than a negative to them. I
don't know how closely you follow the local paper, but in
Cheeks Township, which is near Efland, there is still a major battle
over zoning regulations and that kinda thing, which doesn't
occur here. What we did, I think here, was we felt like we developed a
compromise plan that was livable and also offered us some protection in
exchange for some levy of freedom; I don't know, that sounds
real highfalutin. I mean, some possibilities of
what we could do, which made a difference.