A liberated woman maintains her belief in a patriarchal family structure
While Rahman is "very liberated, even by American standards," she confesses that she accepts a patriarchal family structure, because that model is so engrained in Bangladeshi, and even human, culture. While she would expect her husband to help her with household chores, she would also expect him to be the family breadwinner.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with Kanwal Rahman, July 15, 1999. Interview K-0817. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
Do you feel—? I mean, coming from a very
patriarchal, male-dominated society, like India, Bangladesh or Pakistan,
do you feel that being in this culture has changed your expectation of
relationships between men and women?
- KANWAL RAHMAN:
-
Tremendously! But not totally to the point of equality. I, er. . . a
lot of my American friends find me ext, not extremely, pretty
liberated— even by American standards,
but I explain it to them that that's not liberty,
that's basic human rights as a, as a, as a human being, as
an individual. If I, but—.
- RAJIKA BHANDARI:
-
Could you give an example?
- KANWAL RAHMAN:
-
Example, like—. Ahm. . .. For example, I have a—.
Oh, this a sergeant I, who works at the place that I work at and, we
make conversation, and he says well, what would you do—? Er.
. ... I said well, if my husband goes out so many hours a day and with
his friends, then he shouldn't mind if I also go out with my
friends so many hours as long as I know, he knows where he goes. If I
can cook and clean after I come back from work, then I expect my
husband—regardless whether he's American or India,
or Bangladeshi—to come and help me with the same, and, and,
and then, er. . ... because, you know, otherwise it gets too much for
one single person. Then he, then that person—maybe because
he was in his forties, or late forties—he says
you're very liberated, you know, even by American standards.
A southern girl from these parts wouldn't—, say
that, or expect that. I said, I said I don't believe that.
Anybody educated, or anybody who has some feeling of independence
already established within their personality, would expect that,
regardless of where you, er. . . he she is from. And, ahm. . .. . .
patriarchal family is fine, but I guess it's the feeling of
insecurity and being used to a patriarchal society, I still assume that
it's the male's—which I
don't see in America al the time—to look after the
family or household, because that's the role that had always
been playing from the very beginning. Even from, ahm. . .. Pre-historic
times. The men went out and hunted and brought the food home, and the
women did the nurturing and the cooking, or whatever,
grinding—. If you see those roles, those roles
haven't really changed and I, hundred percent do not believe
that, you know, that, it's fifty-fifty—. Okay, it's fifty—. If
you're earning well, fine. But still it's the
male's role to take care of the wife. Ahm. . . and be there
for support—, and you know, be the major supportive role. If
not financially, but even emotionally, er. . ... but as an emotional
stalwart, I mean, he has to be there. And I don't believe in
single mothers, or single parents bringing up—. If it
happens, it's very hard work for the mother, but
usually—. I mean, it's just not—.
- RAJIKA BHANDARI:
-
It's not something you would opt for, but if—.
- KANWAL RAHMAN:
-
But if it happens, I would probably do my best to rear the child the
best, but I could never even visualize myself as a single mother.
- RAJIKA BHANDARI:
-
Out of choice.
- KANWAL RAHMAN:
-
Out of choice! Exactly.