Lack of violent social unrest at UNC
Sitterson credits his mission to maintain university order and open communication lines with students kept UNC afloat during the turbulent social times.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with J. Carlyle Sitterson, November 4 and 6, 1987. Interview L-0030. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- J. CARLYLE SITTERSON:
-
Yes, it was remarkable. I think that two or three things that explain
that… I think a lot of people really had a role in it. I
think traditions in student government on campus were important in that.
The power structure of student government, while in many instances
critical of University policies, at the same time was a positive force
in trying to keep the students involved in the processes of orderly
consideration of things, rather than departing from that and damning the
whole system.
- PAMELA DEAN:
-
They shared your commitment to procedures?
- J. CARLYLE SITTERSON:
-
That's right. That's correct.
- PAMELA DEAN:
-
To maintaining the basic structure?
- J. CARLYLE SITTERSON:
-
That's right, and so I think that was one thing. I think the
second thing was that when I came, I came in first in the midst of a
crisis, as we've already seen in the Speaker Ban crisis. And
I knew that one of the major tasks that I would face in the years
immediately ahead was to maintain an orderly examination of the things
with which the University was concerned. I recognized that there would
be a lot of dissension, a lot of difference of opinion. My goal, that I
kept above all else, was that when this was over, and I knew it would be
over in some years, how many nobody knew, but I knew the period of the
sixties would not last forever. I mean, anyone
who studied history would know that. So my goal was that when that was
over that we would still be a University in the sense of recognizing
free inquiry, right of dissent, treating each other civilly, and being a
University community.
- PAMELA DEAN:
-
Why were you able to do that when so many other places
weren't? Is this something unique to you and were you
particularly fortunate in the student leaders you worked with? Is it
something endemic to the University?
- J. CARLYLE SITTERSON:
-
I think a combination of all those. I was going to say this, one of the
things in pursuing this goal, that I just indicated, I maintained all
the time personal communication with all elements of the campus. My door
was open all the time, day or night. Any student who wanted to see me or
to give his protest, what was going on, could come in my office and do
so.
- PAMELA DEAN:
-
You had been a very popular teacher. You had a reputation for that. Do
you think that contributed to the students believing that you were, in
fact, open?
- J. CARLYLE SITTERSON:
-
Well, I think, I'm not sure of that because, actually, one
thing we should not forget is that the number of students who were
activists, in the sense of actively doing something as distinct from
watching on the sidelines, was always a very small percentage.