Sitterson's relationship to President William Friday and the student body
Sitterson explains his good working relationship with UNC President William Friday and the student body. He advocated open communication with student activists, but avoided the potential for student sit-ins.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with J. Carlyle Sitterson, November 4 and 6, 1987. Interview L-0030. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- PAMELA DEAN:
-
How about your relationship with President Friday when all these things
that were going on?
- J. CARLYLE SITTERSON:
-
Well, Friday. In fact Governor Scott said that when he was in a big
hassle with the structure of higher education because we were
undergoing, said that everybody knows that President Friday runs the
Chapel Hill campus. In respect to all these things we've been
talking about, President Friday was involved in all of them. I always
involved him. In other words, because, after all, who knows, any one of
them might come to an instance in which he's either got to
overrule me or affirm it. So he was kept, well, he kept well-informed
about every one of these, and of course, he was involved in the Speaker
Ban controversy all the way through and a party to the suit, as I was. I
didn't take any position on these issues that I
hadn't informed him that I was going to
take. Again, we did not, as I recall, openly disagree about any one of
those positions.
- PAMELA DEAN:
-
There was no time when he said, you know, "Let's not
do that. It's not going to go."
- J. CARLYLE SITTERSON:
-
No, I don't remember that. I don't remember that.
He was not the person who was personally identified with the policy
because, unless he was going to overrule it or do something else, it was
something that had been decided by this campus. That was true even of
the Speaker Ban, except less true of that because that involved passage
of procedures by the Board of Trustees and all that kind of thing.
- PAMELA DEAN:
-
It was a system-wide policy. This happened to be the place that was
testing it.
- J. CARLYLE SITTERSON:
-
Right. But these other things, he was not the person who was identified
with presenting it and justifying it and so on, even though he had been
informed and consented to it before… Because I
don't recall, I don't think Friday would cut off
if the Chancellor and he got into a disagreement about an issue, and
this Chancellor wanted to take it to the trustees anyway. I
don't believe Friday would cut it off. I think he would say
to the trustees that he did not agree with that, but he wanted the
Chancellor to have an opportunity to present it. But I didn't
have any instances of that kind, so I don't know.
Didn't have that problem at all. People talk about the
relationships between the President and the Chancellor. In one sense,
the problem here is that the President's office and personal
presence is here, and this is a small town, and the plain fact is,
I've said all the time, you
can't have two number ones in the same place, and
that's essentially the position of the Chancellor in this
system. The Chancellor doesn't have that problem if
he's the Chancellor in Greensboro or the Chancellor in
Raleigh because the President is clearly not there. Students and faculty
too take advantage of that and did over a long time during the Friday
[regime]. Now what will happen in the new regime, I don't
know.
- PAMELA DEAN:
-
But did, I don't recall, were the student marches for various
issues, did they march on your house, or did they march on President
Friday's?
- J. CARLYLE SITTERSON:
-
Both, both. But I'll tell you one instance. One night, they
came to my house--hundreds. Now, it happened that Nancy and I had gone
to bed, and the lights were out, and they were chanting and what not and
so on.
- PAMELA DEAN:
-
Do you remember what the issue was in this case?
- J. CARLYLE SITTERSON:
-
I think it was in the wake of the Kent State thing. Really, the campus
got more incensed over that. There were more people who were
involved.
- PAMELA DEAN:
-
Yes, it was a very hot issue.
- J. CARLYLE SITTERSON:
-
I said to Nancy, "I'm not about to turn on the lights
or get up and go out. This is not a time that I want to because they
were probably not in a state of mind to engage in a rational
discussion." And Chief Beaumont, do you know who Beaumont is?
[Arthur Beaumont, Chief of Campus Police.
- PAMELA DEAN:
-
Yes.
- J. CARLYLE SITTERSON:
-
Beaumont apparently came up and told them that the Chancellor was out for
the evening. So I could hear them discussing it
back and forth because they were right outside the house, oh, by the
hundreds. That same night, they went to Friday's house and
poured paint, red paint, on the porch steps. That's just an
illustration of coming to two houses. You may or may not remember that
over at Duke… A lot of the Duke activists came to President
Knight's residence, and Knight invited them in. They never
left. They occupied his house, day and night. That led to
Knight's, the end of his tenure as President of Duke.
- PAMELA DEAN:
-
Very fine line, then, that you had to walk between being accessible and
maintaining a position.