Tenuous relationships between Chapel Hill, UNC, the students, and their parents
Cusick idealistically believed that segregated public accommodations would end in Chapel Hill due to its liberal reputation. However, he argued that the University of North Carolina counteracted their protests by pressuring parents to stop student activism. Cusick regrets not placing more of a burden upon the University to influence racial change in the town.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with Pat Cusick, June 19, 1989. Interview L-0043. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- PAT CUSICK:
-
...Our big mistake, I said it in the book and I
still believe, our biggest tactical mistake was not putting more of the
burden on the University. I mean that's where we should put
our leverage rather than the town. We and SNCC in Atlanta were the only
two places in the South that were going after a public accommodations
law. But in both places it seemed very doable because we were only one
vote away in Chapel Hill. We actually thought we would get that
ordinance, and it would have been the first one in the South prior to
the national law. So that part, I think we were correct in our tactics
and our strategy. We were stupid in that we did not involve the
University more, as obviously the University has leverage on the
town.
- PAMELA DEAN:
-
They're not quite synonymous but there's an awful
lot of overlap.
- PAT CUSICK:
-
No, and a lot of parents of kids had pressure put on them, different
places where they worked in the University. I couldn't say it
was University policy because it was supervisors
[unclear] . That type of thing.
- PAMELA DEAN:
-
But there was nothing coming from the administration in support of what
you were doing?
- PAT CUSICK:
-
No, and if you look at the size—some people tended to
disbelieve me later on. I don't know the number of faculty
there were then but it was considerable. But if you look at the number
of faculty, that Joe Straley was the only one
is pretty shameful when you stop to think about it, pretty shameful. But
there may have been, I don't know about indirect pressures. I
mean, we certainly knew they were appalled and not in favor.