Changes in higher educational governance in North Carolina
Chambers discusses how the changes in school governance moderated the centralizing force of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, so that non-Chapel Hill higher educational institutions and black colleges had a greater voice.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with Julius L. Chambers, June 18, 1990. Interview L-0127. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- WILLIAM LINK:
-
You were on the Board of Governors? Is that right?
- JULIUS L. CHAMBERS:
-
Yes.
- WILLIAM LINK:
-
In the 1970s?
- JULIUS L. CHAMBERS:
-
Yeah, in the seventies. I think from around '72, or something
like that, through around '76.
- WILLIAM LINK:
-
So it would have been the Board of Governors, as it was in existence,
following the reorganization of the early 1970s?
- JULIUS L. CHAMBERS:
-
Right.
- WILLIAM LINK:
-
Were there rough edges to that reorganization, from the point of view of
the Board of Governors, being on the Board of Governors? Did you see
much in the way of changes that had to be effected in order to make the
system work?
- JULIUS L. CHAMBERS:
-
Yeah. There were a lot of changes that had to take place. I think the
Board of Governors replaced the State Board of higher ed. And the Board
of Governors came in with authority to direct a lot of things that the
State Board only had authority to doߞto try to influence the
proposed policies and then programs. The Board of Governors came in as
the governing agency for higher ed across the state. And this meant
bringing together, not only the then three major entities of the
University system, Chapel Hill, Greensboro, and Raleigh, but also the
five-year colleges, and the four-year colleges, and the traditionally
black institutions. This was a major undertaking. Additionally, the
Board ended up with authority over some private schools in terms of the
types of degrees, etcetera, that they could grant. And there was, during
that period, some monies that were being appropriated by the state, to
support some of the programs at private institutions. So it was a rather
all-encompassing board that required some major changes
in leadership in bringing these institutions in the fold.
- WILLIAM LINK:
-
The old Board of Trustees that used to govern the
threeߞthree-member Consolidated University of North Carolina,
then the six-member Consolidated University that included Charlotte, and
Asheville, and Wilmington. From my point of view, that old Board of
Trustees seemed to have been a smaller group of people that seemed to
representߞthe Executive Committee seemed to run things. And
the same people seemed to be on the Executive Committee. I'm
wondering, the Board of Governorsߞis it correct to say that
the Board of Governors opened things up a little bit? Was there greater
representation? Greater ߞ
- JULIUS L. CHAMBERS:
-
Well, it opened things up a little bit in the sense that it brought onto
the board a number of people who were previously on some of these local
boards. It broughtߞor it opened opportunities for folk to get
on the Board of Governors who never would have gotten on some of these
local institutional boards. Because the major educations in the state
were really almost seats that you passed down, with some heritage or
something. And you inherited a seat. You know, you had to be the
governor, or head of Wachovia, or NCNB, or whatever, to get on. And they
had no blacks on the board. Limited number of women,
except over at Greensboro. And this organization of the governing board
was designed to open up opportunities for forces within the state, to
have a more effective role in the governance of the higher ed.