English's objection to urban revitalization efforts in Belmont
English likens the urban revitalization of her Belmont neighborhood to the urban renewal efforts in the 1960s. She fears that neighborhood history will be lost with gentrification. English argues that the city failed to keep local residents informed of changes and divided the community's residents between the public housing occupants and the larger Belmont neighborhood.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with Diane English, May 19, 2006. Interview U-0183. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- DIANE ENGLISH:
-
Yeah. They moved everybody out that way. That's when I went
out to Pine Valley. Then all of a sudden they let us come back into the
city. Now they're telling us, "Oh we want these
houses." It's like every neighborhood surrounding
the downtown area has been either targeted or revitalizing. What do they
call it? Gentrification. It's exactly what it is.
Gentrification. We know it. We been knowing it for years. It
hasn't been that obvious. Now, it's very
obvious.
- SARAH THUESEN:
-
What do you fear is going to be lost if the gentrification process
continues here in Belmont?
- DIANE ENGLISH:
-
The neighborhood itself, the history of the neighborhood. The houses
because everything is going to condominiums. I don't think
too many people care about the homes anymore. Everybody wants to be
where they don't have to do anything, just pay your rent, pay
your bills. Let somebody else do the work for you. I think a lot of
people are lazy. They don't want
flowers. They don't want to have a space of their own. Then
you have a lot of single people that live by themselves. Maybe they are
afraid to live in a house. I don't know. I feel like
eventually they will lose—. A lot of these homes will be
destroyed simply because they want condos. They have the funds, the
means to do that. I feel like they are very sneaky with it. We went
through a year or two years to get a Belmont plan in place. Now you
virtually don't hear anything about it. It's
always the Hope VI Plan and like what happened to the Belmont plan?
Everything was altered.
- SARAH THUESEN:
-
When you refer to the Belmont plan are you referring to that 2003 report
that came out? The Belmont Revitalization plan the city had for the
neighborhood?
- DIANE ENGLISH:
-
Yes. May 12, 2003.
- SARAH THUESEN:
-
You were a part of that.
- DIANE ENGLISH:
-
Yeah, we were the—what do they call it—the stake
holders. The six stake holders that never missed a meeting for almost
two years to get the plan together as they said. Then all of a sudden
there was a lot of changes that we weren't aware of. It took
us about a year to get the new, original books. The new—what
do they call them—books. We had the original plan book. Then
they edit it, some of the material. We never got that one. I think we
got that one last year, the year before, last year.
- SARAH THUESEN:
-
You felt like the city was making changes the residents didn't
want.
- DIANE ENGLISH:
-
They made changes that we weren't aware of. Their excuse for
that was we had to do it and we had to do it in X amount of time. We
didn't have time to come back to you all.
- SARAH THUESEN:
-
Give me an example of a change that you weren't in favor
of.
- DIANE ENGLISH:
-
The Hope VI. Everything about the Hope VI was—. In fact we
were doing the Belmont plan when they were trying to do a Hope VI plan
at that particular time. It was like it was a split thing. Charlotte
Housing Authority was working on the Piedmont Court people. We used to
go there and try to get them into the neighborhood to be a part of the
neighborhood meetings. They would always say the Housing Authority is
starting us up a community organization. The Housing Authority it doing
this for us and blah, blah, blah. IT was like they would be going to the
Hope VI. We would be going to the Belmont plant. This was going on
simultaneously at the same time.