Comparing the Bryn Mawr School for Women Workers and the Southern Summer School for Women Workers
Mitchell contrasts his experiences as an instructor at the Summer School for Women Workers at Bryn Mawr College in Pennsylvania during the early 1920s with those at the Southern Summer School for Women Workers at Sweet Briar College in Virginia during the late 1920s. Mitchell recalls that at Bryn Mawr, the students came from a more diverse labor pool. In addition, many of the women workers who came already had experience in unionization. In general, they were more oriented around labor activism and the focus tended to be national in scope. In contrast, the women at the Southern School were almost entirely from factory backgrounds. Few had experience with organized labor and, as a result, curriculum was different in scope. In addition, the Southern Summer School focused more on regional labor issues.
Citing this Excerpt
Oral History Interview with Broadus Mitchell, August 14 and 15, 1977. Interview B-0024. Southern Oral History Program Collection (#4007) in the Southern Oral History Program Collection, Southern Historical Collection, Wilson Library, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Full Text of the Excerpt
- MARY FREDERICKSON:
-
Since you had been at Bryn Mawr and then came down to the Southern
School, how would you compare the two?
- JOHN BROADUS MITCHELL:
-
At Bryn Mawr the workers came from a greater variety of employments, and
there were more of them, and it was better financed, though we were
certainly very well off at Sweet Briar. But it was hard to raise money
for it, and Louise Leonard spent her whole winter going around trying to
get contributions and to encourage unions to encourage their members or
working women to come on these scholarships to the college. But when
they went to Burnsville in particular, I think it had shrunk a good
deal. I believe it continued for some time after that. You know; I
don't. But I remember at Burnsville there was a deficit, we were
wondering how we could recruit some funds to make up for it. And
one of our tutors at Bryn Mawr had been Evelyn
Preston, who became Mrs. Roger Baldwin afterwards. And Evelyn was a
woman of means, and I had worked with her at Bryn Mawr so I volunteered
to write her and ask if she would contribute $750.00 or
whatever it was to wipe out our little deficit, and Evelyn did. Right
away she sent a check, and that was very kind and that helped. But that
is my recollection of the Burnsville undertaking.
- MARY FREDERICKSON:
-
They were working in those early years at a time when nothing was
organized, practically, in the South. The unions were just beginning to
come in.
- JOHN BROADUS MITCHELL:
-
That's right. There was more flavor of unionism at Bryn Mawr than in the
Southern Summer School, as I recall. At Bryn Mawr the women in charge of
the Summer School were
[laughter]
taken aback, I think, because hardly had the students come
before they made a demand on Hilda Smith that the black maids be moved
from the attic of the dormitory, where there were dormer windows and it
was hot, to better quarters. It was one of those things that hadn't
occurred even to the most farsighted and devoted planners, that as they
were inviting union women to come, they were going to ask for union
conditions or something approaching it for the help. Hilda Smith
responded right away, and they were able to meet the requests of these
people, and so everything was all right. But in the South there wasn't
that, and there was much more sameness of personnel and of environment
and experience of the workers. At Bryn Mawr they had come from
considerable distances, and I remember there was, for instance, a woman
whose work was washing the windows of trains at
Chicago or someplace like that in the yards. And there were people who
had been in every kind of industry, the shoe industry and clothing and .
. . Whereas in the South, my recollection is that they were mostly
factory workers. I think the teaching was much the same in both, the
conduct of the classes and so on. One of the tutors at Sweet Briar was
Amber Arthun Mrs. Clark Warburton she became afterwards. Amber died
recently. She was a very fine woman who had come from the State of
Washington and spent her life trying to promote education and unionism
among southern women. She lived outside of Washington in later years,
after she married Clark who was connected with Brookings. Lois was a
principal engine of the Southern Summer School. After that I had the
pleasure of being on the Board for a couple of years, but I never
afterwards had close contact with the Summer School.
- MARY FREDERICKSON:
-
How were these people oriented politically?
- JOHN BROADUS MITCHELL:
-
I can't say. They had had less experience in community participation of
any sort. It was an indigenous thing in the Southern Summer School. It
was kind of a family thing. I mean we were all of the same background,
really, or identification, and it was apt to be geared to southern
problems, southern history, southern needs, whereas at Bryn Mawr it had
been more national, and the whole outlook was . . . I don't know whether
I should say the outlook was different; I think that as far as the
faculty went, their hopes were the same. But in the Southern Summer
School we had a certain sameness and primary grade atmosphere that we
didn't have at Bryn Mawr. They had many more women at Bryn Mawr
who had been active in their unions or plants or
whatever; they were on the whole older; and there were individuals who
stood out more, as I recall, at Bryn Mawr than in the southern one.
Though afterwards - and not very long after that,
either - some instances occurred in which southern workers took
the initiative and were extremely pertinacious.