Letter from
William Hooper
to the
Committee of
Appointment, January 27, 1834
Hooper, William, 1792-1876
Page 1
Chapel Hill
Jan. 27th 1834
Whereas in all deliberative bodies, a dissenting minority claims the right
of a protest against the decision of the majority, and sometimes deem it
their duty publickly to express it; and whereas the Faculty of this University, by a late vote, have agreed to recommend to the
Committee of appointment the immediate choice
of a Professor of Rhetoric and a third Tutor, the Professor of Languages
differing from them in opinion feels it due to himself & to the
Department over which he presides, to lay before the Committee a full view of the state of classical instruction in
this Institution that they may act with a full understanding of the
case.
1. The study of the classics, by the decree of the Trustees, is made to
occupy two thirds of the time of the Students during the Freshman &
Sophomore years; that is, during half the College course.
2. These two classes embrace, almost always, a considerable minority of the
whole body of students; the classes uniformly growing thinner during the
last two years.
3. Hence appears the importance of having efficient instruction for the two
lower classes, since most of those who resort to the University
are in those classes.
4. But it is a notorious fact, that the instruction of the Freshman &
Sophomore classes has been consigned entirely to Tutors, who are almost
always, fresh graduates, without experience, and of scholarship scarcely
superior to their pupils. This is not mentioned, to upbraid the Tutors, who
are often meritorious young men, but it is not to be expected that the small
salary given them will gain the services of any others than graduates at
their first setting out, nor that these will retain the station long enough
to acquire scholarship or skill in teaching. It is found, in fact, that they
very seldom stay more than a year, often only one session; & thus
are those devoted classes doomed to a continual transfer from apprentices to
still younger apprentices; a species of mental
Page 2
persecution scarcely less deplorable than the bodily calamity which a
patient would sustain, if, laboring under some serious disease, he were to
be tampered with, every week, by a fresh quack, just discharged from
Philadelphia
with his new Diploma.
5. The evils of this system are more numerous than can be conceived of by any
who have not witnessed them.
In the first place, it is an imposition on the public, who of course expect,
that at the University of the State, better instruction will
be provided for their sons than what they have at home; whereas it is, in
fact, much inferior.
Again the two lower classes, contract, by being in the hands of young tutors,
for whom they have very little fear or respect, a looseness of scholarship
& manners which has a disastrous effect on their whole college
course, & materially interrupts the tranquility of the Institution.
Rude conduct about the recitation room & sometimes in the presence
of the Tutor is a bad preparation for regular habits in the more advanced
part of the course. As to the effects on scholarship, let any experienced
teacher say whether it is possible, for a professor to make good scholars
out of youths they neglected or mistaught during their noviciate. No: he
cannot, & it ought not to be expected or required of him. The
Professor of Languages has long seen & deplored the evils of this
system; every examination exhibits melancholy proofs of them & he
sees no hope of an amendment as long as the present plan is pursued. He
fearlessly appeals to every student who has undergone it, whether it is not
very little that he has ever learned from the tuition of tutors.
6. If it be asked, why then are tutors so generally employed in our Colleges,
it may be replied that it is submitting to a necessary evil. As long as
students are collected together in buildings by themselves, there must be
some officers to control them, & by these economy requires some of
the instruction to be done. But the less
instruction that is done by them, & the
more that is done by permanent officers, is undoubtedly the best policy.
Page 3
Nor is the success of those colleges which employ numerous tutors any
recommendation of the system. It is a fact confessed by hundreds of students
from the
New
England Colleges, as we have it on the authority of
Prof. Stuart
of
Andover,
that they were more classical scholars when they left college than when they
entered it, & this notwithstanding that, the Tutors
there employed, are older & more
experienced than any we can get.
7. These things being so, it is respectfully submitted to the Trustees, whether something ought not to be done to remedy this
crying grievance. Why is all expenditure & all efficient tuition
lavished on the two upper classes? Why are classics admitted to such a
conspicuous rank in the scheme of education, if any accidental teacher, who
may be employed for a year or six months is adequate to instruct in them?
According to present arrangements, the two upper classes will have the
monopoly of six professors, with the exception that if a Prof. of Rhetoric
is appointed, he will give some lessons to the Sophomore Class. The late
professorship endowed is an adjunct to the Mathematical Department. Why
should not the Classical Department have an adjunct? Altho' it will not be
denied that the Professorship of Rhetoric is wanted to complete the
establishment, yet the writer of this Protest was once induced to relinquish
that station, & accept his present one because the former was not
thought indispensable. It is his decided opinion that among the Professors
now in existence, the duties of the Professorship of Rhetoric about to be
appointed, ought to be assigned to the Department
of Languages, either as adjunct in the Latin & Greek or as Prof. of
one of those Languages, solely. This is not singular. The writer knows it to
be the case in several of the first colleges in the Union.
If the
Committee refuse this, they will
not at least assign to the new Professor a
portion of the classical tuition? If they think that their powers do
not reach to a provision against the evil herein complained of, will they
bear
Page 4
in mind this statement, to be presented
to the
Board as soon as an occasion may occur for acting upon it?
The Professor of Languages has now done his duty in letting the Trustees know the wants of his Department. If they will not
interpose to remedy the evil, he will feel himself absolved from the
responsibility of attempting to make classical scholars at this college,
& resign himself to the tranquility of despair. He is now in the
decline of life, & of feeble constitution. He hopes it is no
presumption to think that his long experience entitles his opinions to some
respect & his long services to some assistance in sharing the labor
& responsibility of his department.