Hedrick, Benjamin Sherwood, 1827-1886
Page 1
Chapel Hill, Oct. 14, 1856
Dear Sir:
I am glad that the executive committee did not yield to a popular clamor and remove me from my
situation here. For I believe that if I can have a full and fair hearing before the Trustees, the censure implied in the resolutions which you possed will be found
to be more than my offence merited, tho' as matters now stand it was as little as I could expect.
No one more than myself acknowledges the justness and propriety of the usage which prohibits
members of the faculty from agitating topics relating to party politics. But there are instances
when it seems to me the usage may be disregarded. In fact about eight years ago one of the ablest
and most learned professors in the
University thought it incumbent on himself to define his position on
the slavery question. But the principle circumstance which I would plead in extenuation of this
breach of a well known usage is the manner in which I was attacked. If members of the faculty have
their hands tied they should be shielded from assault. I am a citizen of the state, a native if
there is any merit in that, and have always endeavored to be a faithful law abiding member of the
community. But all at once I am assailed as an outlaw, a traitor, as a person fit to be driven from
the state by mob violence, one whom every good citizen was bound to cast out by fair means or foul.
This was more than
Page 2
I could bear. It seemed to me that I ought to resent it as a tyranical interference with
the rights of private opinion. So that in judging my case it will be necessary to keep in mind the
gross insults contained in the charges brought against me by the "Standard." What
I had said here about voting for
Fremont
amounted to almost nothing, as no one expected that an attempt to form
an electoral ticket would be made. In fact I heard an influential citizen say he would vote for
Fremont
himself if he thought the electing him would bring about a
dissolution of the
Union, whilst I would vote for him to make the
Union stronger.
But the state of the case which comes home to the
Trustees more directly than any other is the influence my course will
have upon the prosperity of the
University. My own opinion is that if the newspapers will let the
matter rest it will soon be forgotten. The election will soon be over, one of the candidates will
probably be elected, and the others will soon cease to be talked of. What I said of slavery is
neither fanatical incendiary nor inflammatory, I have never held abolitionist views. If my reasons
for keeping the increase of the slave population at home are good, of course no one will blame me
for setting them forth. If my reasons are unsound I have erred on a question upon which there always
has been, and probably always will be, an honest difference of opinion among thinking men. It is
only a short time since I saw an article in a
Virginia paper
Page 3
denouncing professor
Bledsoe
of the
University of Va, because he admitted in his book on Liberty & Slavery
that the interests & prosperity of the territories where slavery does not now exist, might
be best advanced by excluding it. But for that opinion he was not treated as an outlaw, nor any
attempt made to drive him from his chair.
But I am not disposed to find fault with the action of the
Trustees. Some of the newspapers pretend that I am only wishing to be
dismissed in order to attain to profitable martyrdom. If I were base enough to resort to such a
miserable trick my denying the charge would go for nothing. I do not believe however that such a
charge will be made by anyone at all aquainted with the circumstances which placed me in my present
position. I had not sought the election from the
Trustees, and yet the appointment was most acceptable to me. When I
graduated I received a subordinate situation in one of the scientific offices of the general
government, a place not at all subject to the prescriptions of party. My services were so far
acceptable that I was promoted at the end of the first year, and at the time I resigned that
situation my salary was equal to that offered me by the
Trustees. It was against the advice of some of my best friends that I
made the exchange. I have always acted on the principle that a good citizen will serve his native
state in preference to any other. And I thought the situation offered me by the
Trustees was one in which I might find honorable and useful employment,
and at the same time do something for the good of my native state. Whether my labors here have been
Page 4
successful I will leave for others to determine. In coming here I sacrificed all other
prospects. I have been here only long enough to begin to take root, and to be driven out now when I
am just faint started seems hard. But I will not ask anything unreasonable of the
Trustees. It is well known that my chair does not belong to the regular
academic course. My students are, just those who enter for a scientific course. Of these I have had
fourteen during the present session. 2
nd the regular academic students are permitted during the senior year, to
substitute studies in my Department for a part of the regular course. Forty four seniors have during
this session "elected" studies in my department. If anyone therefore is afraid for
his son to recite to me he has but to say that he wishes him to take the "old
course" in the senior year.
As I said before I believe that all this trouble about politics will soon pass over. If it does not
and it is apparent that my usefulness is lost or greatly impaired I will not ask to be retained
longer. The "scientific school" is a venture in which I have staked a great deal,
and therefore respectfully ask that whatever final action the Board may take that they would act with caution and deliberation. For
my own part I am very sorry that I have been the occasion of trouble to the committed. But I hope
that when they come to know me better they will find me to be one not deserving to be driven from
the state by hue and cry.